| Multi Club Ownership 18:46 - Jan 4 with 485 views | kingslandstand1 |
We all agree that SR have totally fkd up our club, primarily with recruitment as I don't think there are many now on the playing or coaching or senior management teams that were here when they took over, but is this down to the fact that we are just one of three clubs on their books
As long as they are making a few bob out of the odd decent transfer and the fun fair rides on the side they are happy with that. They have no real sense of feeling or the club or supporters or dare I use the word passion that most on this site at least have as they have no affiliation for the club, and have probably never even heard of Ted Bates fori nstance!
Would their attitude and nuance towards us be different if we were the only club on their books?
Should the FA be looking at multi-club ownership when assessing being fit and proper ownership or is this just sour grapes |  |
| |  |
| Multi Club Ownership on 19:09 - Jan 4 with 406 views | shotters |
Im happy to be proven wrong but I've yet to see any benefits
I've always had the feeling that we were the cash cow that was being used to fund the two other sides
I think that Brighton are part of a multi club set up but the difference their is that their chairman is Tony Bloom, a lifelong Seagulls fan who makes decisions on what's best for the club, not what will make him the most money
Apologies for yet another negative post this evening! [Post edited 4 Jan 19:10]
|  |
| Fail we may, sail we must |
| |
| Multi Club Ownership on 20:00 - Jan 4 with 306 views | Bridders2 |
We need to show Sports Republic that we've had enough of their stupid fu cking experiments. |  | | |
| Multi Club Ownership on 21:15 - Jan 4 with 202 views | kingslandstand1 |
| Multi Club Ownership on 19:09 - Jan 4 by shotters |
Im happy to be proven wrong but I've yet to see any benefits
I've always had the feeling that we were the cash cow that was being used to fund the two other sides
I think that Brighton are part of a multi club set up but the difference their is that their chairman is Tony Bloom, a lifelong Seagulls fan who makes decisions on what's best for the club, not what will make him the most money
Apologies for yet another negative post this evening! [Post edited 4 Jan 19:10]
|
That's true, but his other club just happens to be top of the Scottish Premiership! So he must be doing something right and is cleaarly doing something right
But he has also gone in to this game for the love of it, rather than purely a business operation | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
