Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Ross Stewart Shows That Saints Players Will Put Their Own Interests Before Morals
Tuesday, 9th Jun 2026 08:58

A few weeks ago some were suggesting that Saints players would be disgusted by the Spygate issues and would demand to leave, I suggested that they would be making their decisions on what would be best for them personally before any morals came into play and I am being proved right.

Dragan Solak recently highlighted the issues surrounding Ross Stewart’s contract, Saints had an option for the right to extend it for a year, this had to be exercised within 5 days of the final game of the season and this is were it got tricky.

The final game of the season was suddenly extended to the 2nd leg of the play offs and when that game was won, it would extend to the play off final, which as we all know was cancelled, meaning that the deadline had passed.

Now there is a legal issue as to whether Saints have the right to extend, something that Stewart’s agent is saying that they don’t and whilst they are not ruling out re signing for Southampton, they want to look for other options.

This is not the way I envisaged Southampton players putting their own agenda’s before morals, but it is just as relevant.

You would have hoped that Ross Stewart might have had some sort of loyalty to Southampton FC, after all we had paid him for doing virtually nothing in his first season and his second season was also very much injury hit and his contribution was very little.

Last season saw him finally get free of injuries and show what he can do and most would have hoped that he and Cyle Larin would again form a lethal partnership.

But of course most would also have hoped that Stewart would have had some morals and repaid the faith that Saints has shown in him with some loyalty, but it seems he and his agent’s don’t think that way.

I can understand why they would want to explore other options and this will end two ways, either he will get a better deal that is on the table for him at St Mary’s or he won’t and then we will see him scuttle back making noises about only wanting to delay signing because he wanted to concentrate on the World Cup with Scotland, a competition that he will hope will see him become hot property after.


Now I can understand all this, I am not whinging, but it highlights my original point of a few weeks ago, professional football players or at least the majority of them march to the sound of the biggest pay cheque at the highest level they can get and not to the beating of the drums on the club badge.

So I am disappointed in Ross Stewart but not surprised, it shows that who stays and goes this summer was never going to be about the morals of the Southampton players, it was always going to be about whether they got better offers and if they didn’t then they were going to stay.

As I also said back then we are not going to see anyone leave and sign for Lincoln City for £5 a week less just so they can keep the moral high ground.

I truly hope that this situation is resolved and that Ross Stewart is a Southampton player next season, I just wish that perhaps if it does happen that it would have been handled slightly differently.

Via Reuters



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



GRIM added 09:15 - Jun 9
I agree with your comments but the reality is that this happens in all walks of life.
If you're offered more money to do the same job then most people would take it.
I'm not defending Ross Stewarts stance because I think he owes our club after the way we have protected, paid & nursed him back to playing again.
Despite him being a useful Championship player I have reservations about him staying fit.
So it might not be the end of the world if he leaves.
2

DorsetIan added 09:17 - Jun 9
Focusing on a player's 'morals' is ridiculous.

Saints were aware of the terms of the contract and they could have exercised the option at any time.

If there was any ambiguity on what the 'end of the season' meant within the terms of the contract the Club could have clarified that issue with the player is his representatives, or exercised the option in good time to avoid any issues.

If the Club weren't rushing to extend Ross Stewart's contract why does he have a moral duty to allow them to exercise an option that might already have expired?
3

Block8 added 09:31 - Jun 9
I personally read the situation as, if we were promoted we'd let him go.
It seems the only reason we didn't extend the contract earlier?
3

saintmark1976 added 09:54 - Jun 9
Spot on DorsetIan and Block8.

In any event I can’t see what all the fuss is about.

Ross is a half decent Championship player who apparently can’t consistently play Ninety minutes football.

He’s not suddenly going to turn into the next Ricky Lambert.

If he finds another club and they increase his wages then good luck to him.

6

Monksway added 11:06 - Jun 9
I find these discussions about loyalty and morals a bit bizarre within the context of professional sport. They are simply temporary employees, all the rest is part of the show! Saints surely wouldn't have kept Stewart had we been promoted. He was paid during his injury because Saints were contractually obliged to do so and would have taken out insurance accordingly. Whilst a contract extension might have made sense for a player with this injury record a new two year contract doesn't. Eckert and the medical team managed him brilliantly during the second half of the season but I wouldn't choose to be reliant on his fitness for a full season as an alternate to Larin. Look how many strikers Coventry needed to win the league last year. Another robust Championship centre forward is an imperative regardless of whether Stewart stays or goes.
6

highfield49 added 11:25 - Jun 9
If, as recorded elsewhere, Stewart's base salary is £12.5k a week and the club is willing to retain him for another year on that basis then I can see why his agent might look at options elsewhere. There are other outlets suggesting that he had been offered a new contract on reduced terms which Stewart's agent also advised caution. Such is the world of business and the club is not a charity.
Whilst not fit to play Stewart must have endured a lot of physical discomfort and doubts about his recovery, at the same time the club would be reluctant to gamble on his long term fitness.
We don't know whether Stewart will sustain another long term injury in the weeks ahead so it makes a lot of sense for the club and player to put contract decisions on hold.
0

SaintPaulVW added 12:38 - Jun 9
Forget morals, clubs are dealing with multi year contracts of varying length all the time. Missing a known deadline is just unacceptable.
-1

davidargyll added 12:41 - Jun 9
Personally I think you are talking a lot of nonsense about player loyalty.
Ross Stewart and/or his agent is just exploring all options, no more no less. The fact is that I and probably most fans would be amazed if he finds another club as long-suffering as the Saints, but I absolutely see no problem in him trying.
Because it cuts both ways: if we find someone to replace him then he will suddenly find he's not in such a nice situation, especially given that no one is going to play a premium for a player whose fitness is no better than debatable
2

Ali_Diarea added 14:21 - Jun 9
It’s a shame the clause didn’t apply to last game of the season for club or country…I bet he’ll be trying to extend if he gets injured at the World Cup
-1

jameslastfan added 14:25 - Jun 9
There is a risk for Ross here isn’t there. Being prone to injury with the World Cup around the corner without a contract if he gets injured there he is in trouble.

Better he chose to stay with Saints to protect himself as much as anything.

Hope he stays personally.
0

SonicBoom added 14:49 - Jun 9
Strange situation. You would think players would want to give something back when they were paid for long periods of injury but that's just naivety unfortunately. (I'm looking at you Livramento).
But Ross is going to be lucky to get a better deal. I'm not convinced he's 100% robust yet and i still cringe when he goes into any tackle. In fact I'm not sure he's ever played 90 minutes for us has he? So which other club is going to pay him more and gamble on his fitness?
0

WestSussexSaint added 17:57 - Jun 9
Agents have a poor reputation and in many cases that is deserved. In this case it looks like an agent doing his job and acting in the best interests of his client. It was unfortunate that Saints fell foul of the timing clause but that is ultimately down to them and not Stewart or his agent. I expect they will see how the World Cup goes which could increase his market value and as a result the number and value of offers.

Personally I want him to stay but given his injury record he will be more conscious than most about the fragility of a career and the need to maximise his earnings while he can.
0

Bowlercow added 23:19 - Jun 9
I'd like Ross to stay but the agent sees a pay day here.If he goes to another club he could pick up a multi million pound fee,if he stays here here get a lower but non the less signing fee If we had exercised the option there would be no agents fee.
0

mascott514 added 01:06 - Jun 10
When good guys like Will Smallbone don't cut the mustard, but would happily have stayed (assumption) I don't see the morality police crying when we ship players out. Ross is a good guy, doing a good job. I hope he stays - wish him well if the goes elsewhere...
1

YosemiteSaint added 01:39 - Jun 10
Saints fans' conviction that we were wronged by Spygate (a conviction that's only partially true, I think), can't be extended into player loyalty—especially to veteran players who are looking out for their futures and know they're one bad tackle or misstep away from career-compromising injury. Like everyone else here, I'd prefer that Ross stay. But he's off to his first World Cup and his future is very much in the balance. (And he has to do it in my stupid effing country, which I wouldn't wish on anyone these days!) So good on him for keeping his options open. If he sticks with us, so much the better.
0

dirk_doone added 21:39 - Jun 10
That headline is not fair on Ross Stewart. He's a professional footballer, who has never earned very big wages, and his agent is trying to get him more money before he retires. With his injury record, he might not have many more playing days left. Then he has another 50 years or so to support himself and his family.

I wish him well and hope he stays, but that article might make his mind up to leave.
0


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 31 bloggers

Southampton Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2026