By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
I could never understand why anyone wanting children would send them away to boarding school. Why have them if you don’t want to bring them up? Little wonder that the Royal family is so dysfunctional. When I was naughty as a child my mum used to threaten to send me to boarding school which used to scare the crap out of me. I spent 2 weeks away in hospital having my tonsils out which was bad enough. Our problem isn’t boarding schools though. Our problem is that we elect these dysfunctional people to lead us. So what does that say about the electorate?
0
An interesting piece on 09:43 - Aug 8 with 928 views
An interesting piece on 09:38 - Aug 8 by Sadoldgit
I could never understand why anyone wanting children would send them away to boarding school. Why have them if you don’t want to bring them up? Little wonder that the Royal family is so dysfunctional. When I was naughty as a child my mum used to threaten to send me to boarding school which used to scare the crap out of me. I spent 2 weeks away in hospital having my tonsils out which was bad enough. Our problem isn’t boarding schools though. Our problem is that we elect these dysfunctional people to lead us. So what does that say about the electorate?
It must show that the electorate thought the alternative party was a worse choice. Doh
0
An interesting piece on 11:20 - Aug 8 with 869 views
It must show that the electorate thought the alternative party was a worse choice. Doh
Or that a lot of the electorate actually think people from that kind of privileged upbringing and education really do care and understand the needs of the working class..........doh
0
An interesting piece on 11:53 - Aug 8 with 841 views
An interesting piece on 11:53 - Aug 8 by Sadoldgit
The majority of the electorate did not vote Tory, so not so.
Doesn’t follow. Certainly more of the electorate voted them in. Do you really think voters think about the education of the MPs rather than their intentions?
0
An interesting piece on 18:59 - Aug 8 with 691 views
Doesn’t follow. Certainly more of the electorate voted them in. Do you really think voters think about the education of the MPs rather than their intentions?
I don’t know what people were thinking when they voted for Boris Johnson but the majority of people who voted did not vote for him.
0
An interesting piece on 19:04 - Aug 8 with 680 views
Doesn’t follow. Certainly more of the electorate voted them in. Do you really think voters think about the education of the MPs rather than their intentions?
Bang on there Bazza. I’d no more discriminate against a person for being “posh” than I would for being poor. It’s not as if either is their fault. Classic inverse snobbery.
An interesting piece on 19:04 - Aug 8 by Chesham_Saint
Bang on there Bazza. I’d no more discriminate against a person for being “posh” than I would for being poor. It’s not as if either is their fault. Classic inverse snobbery.
I don’t think it has anything to do with being “posh”. More to do with being maladjusted and not being suitable for running the country.
An interesting piece on 19:04 - Aug 8 by Chesham_Saint
Bang on there Bazza. I’d no more discriminate against a person for being “posh” than I would for being poor. It’s not as if either is their fault. Classic inverse snobbery.
It’s not inverse snobbery ffs it’s about understanding the needs of your fellow man You really think BoJo and his bullingdon boys give a f**k about what we really need?!