Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Sweet FA 16:23 - Oct 7 with 447 viewssaint22

That’s some result
UTFS
0
Sweet FA on 16:28 - Oct 7 with 383 viewsyateleysaint

Praise the Lord!

You cannot reason a person out of something they were not reasoned into.

0
Sweet FA on 16:37 - Oct 7 with 339 views1885_SFC

Have Steve Gibson & Boro lodged an appeal against the punishment yet?

W@nkers.

Old Skool is Kool

0
Sweet FA on 17:35 - Oct 7 with 184 viewsdirk_doone

The independent tribunal, unlike the EFL, treated this without prejudice as a legal case and there was only one relevant legal precedent: Leeds and Bielsa. Legal precedents normally determine the outcomes of subsequent cases.

How that so-called independent EFL panel with its Boro connections got away with replacing Saints with Boro in the play-off final, Gibbo only knows. Presumably, if we'd had the same legal team then, they wouldn't have got away with it. The time for appeal would have extended past the play-off final and the panel members with obvious Boro connections, like David Winnie, would have been replaced before he could propose replacing Saints with Boro in the final..
[Post edited 7 Oct 17:39]

Poll: How many Pompey fans post on here, pretending to be Saints fans?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2026