Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Koeman Is The Man
Tuesday, 17th Jun 2014 08:17

The worst kept rumour of the past few weeks was confirmed when Saints appointed Ronald Koeman as the 19th manager in 23 years of Southampton Football Club.

Ronald Koeman takes up his post as Saints manager knowing that the average lifespan of a Premier League manager is a little less than two years and that as boss of Saints slightly less at around 15 months, but like all new appointees he comes talking the talk and needing to walk the walk.

But of all the previous 18 permanent Saints managers since the sacking of Chris Nicholl in 1991, Koeman arrives with the best pedigree of them all, arguably only Graeme Souness could claim to have as good a record, however his three Scottish titles with Rangers could be said to have been earned in a league far inferior to the Dutch Eridivisie where Koeman won his three titles with two different clubs, this being the case Koeman's experience as a coach both with the Dutch International side as well as a host of top knotch names in not only Holland but Spain and Portugal surely make him the best manager to have ever been appointed by Saints on the basis of his previous track record.

With the current choppy seas at St Mary's the time was not right to appoint another Mauricio Pochettino, rather than an up and coming coach with plenty to prove but little in the way of past success, Saints needed to make a statement of intent, they needed a man who had a reputation and although Koeman is not up there with the likes of Pep Guardiola, Jose Mourinho etc, he can be said to be in the second tier of European managers, ie those who have won domestic titles but never taken their clubs to success in the European Competitions.

So Koeman appears to be a good fit for Saints, he is experienced, he has a reputation both as a manager and player, he has the clout to not only perhaps convince some members of our squad to stay but to attract some quality names coming in, he has a philosophy about how he wants things run and this appears to sit in nicely with what Saints themselves want.

In short its hard to see who realistically Saints could have got who is better, certainly some of the Spurs fans I know would prefer Koeman to now be in charge at White Hart Lane than Pochettino.

What Koeman needs now though is the unequivical backing of the Saints fans, there are some who are not prepared to give not only Koeman but Katharina Liebherr and her board a fair chance to show that not only do they have the best interests of the club at heart, but know what they are doing.

The appointment of Ronald Koeman perhaps show that they do know something about what they need to do to take things forward to a higher level, they kept their nerve, took their time and got what they consider to be the right man for the job, this being the case they should be applauded for this.

But the proof of the pudding is now in the eating, Koeman has the track record he now needs to walk the walk in England, the next two months will be crucial, he needs to re vamp the coaching staff, something that he has already started to do with the appointment of his brother Erwin, a manager with good experience in his own right as well as one of the former Feyenoord coaches Jan Kluitenberg.

In many respects Saints will now be the envy of most of the Premier league, some Saints fans are spouting doom and gloom after the departure of Pochettino, but the fact is that over half of the Premier League would like to be in our position, a manager with the pedigree of Koeman, significant money to improve the squad which could be further boosted with the departure of a few key players and a strong basis to build on.

Saints will have some stormy seas after the World Cup, but all clubs lose players, due to the riches being offered in wages, all bar a select few are selling clubs, yes ideally you keep all your players, but the key to success at Southampton Football Club has always been about producing players and after selling them, producing more and keeping moving forward, certain ex players have slammed Saints for being a feeder club, but that was the way we had to work in the past and that is the way we will need to work in the future if we are to keep moving forward, perhaps that is a harsh reality for some, but it is a harsh truth as well.

But in Koeman we have a man who can take us forward, I for one feel that in this respect we are now better positioned than we were a month or so ago.

Photo: Action Images via Reuters



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



ThereIn76 added 09:10 - Jun 17
Great appointment which shows that Katharina Liebherr, Ralph Kruger and Les Reed know what they are doing. Koeman can't have been a cheap option so it shows ambition. It would be great if he can persuade some of our supposedly want-away players to stay, but if their minds are already made up, it gives him a chance to bring in new blood and shape the team in his way.

Hopefully Koeman has a less jaundiced view of the Europa League than MoPo.

Time to get behind the club and show the new manager what top-notch fans we are. Hopefully the club will bring back the red and white stripes with the new kit supplier, whoever that will be. And let's finish higher than THFC :)
4

montecristo added 09:12 - Jun 17
How very negative, Nick. This kind of talk is what has been holding the club back, at least where the supporters are concerned. You should forget the club s history and stop thinking that the only way forward is for Saints to sell their best players, its complete nonsense, and not the way to achieve Champions League football at all. I sometime wonder whether Saints will ever finally shed that dreadful provincial attitude that somehow they are not as good as city clubs. it drives me wild because its the most negative thing I ever hear from Saints fans, well some of them anyway, who have not forgotten the mud ridden days of slogging to the Dell to watch games hoping for rather than expecting a win.
2

simmo400 added 09:20 - Jun 17
Agree with your comments Nick. Seems a good fit for us on the face of it and if we play in a Dutch type why few would complain. I read on another post that RK doesent seem to fight to keep players if they want away. This i also agree with if true, line up the ones who want to play for Southampton the others can go for the right price. Onwards and upwards for Saints now I hope as in fed up with all the negative press for the last month or so.
3

landsdownsaint added 09:25 - Jun 17
Maybe NC would have dismissed MoPo when he saw Koeman become available ? Many thanks to the current board for carrying on the the project ...the Southampton way .
5

SaintNick added 10:03 - Jun 17
montecristo, why is it negative to discuss the possibility of players leaving, you call me negative for suggesting that the way forward is to sell players for top dollar, but I could call you a fantasist for suggesting that a club of this size can hold on to its best players in the current climate, look at Liverpool and Lambert, they have signed him to bolster their squad not their premier league team and that i what we are up against as well as teams who buy players just to stop their rivals getting them.

Before we talk of champions league football, we have to be in the next tier of clubs, 6th -9th, Everton & Spurs are good examples of clubs in the position we need to emulate first before we talk of Champions league qualification.

If Saints held on to every player this summer and spent £50 million I would suggest that we would finish no better than 7th, this is based on the reality that every club ahead of us bar Everton would probably spend more
1

slynch added 10:37 - Jun 17
The previous mangership has built up the club to an extent that top ranking mangers are attacted to St Marys the current managership seem now to be continuing with the progression. I don't think any Saints fan could realistically expect a manager with better credentials to be appointed. And with Lambert gone it might be advisable to let him take the freekicks and penalties! And maybe, too he can teach Keuger to speak single Dutch?
2

Stephen added 11:10 - Jun 17
"talking the talk and needing to walk the walk."
Why don't you just "walking the talk". It's a lot simpler.
0

Zambucco added 13:52 - Jun 17
Nick those fans who are not prepared to give their backing to RK or KL will soon be chanting their names after a couple of wins! They are the same fans, who moaned about Pardew, probably moaned about the fat carthorse Lambert who cost £1m from ROVERS? and that young northern twot at £8m from burnley. Then it was, who is Adkins? who the hell Pocchetinwho? he's barely avoided relegation with a second rate Spanish team!

I've seen the light and it's Orange (well in my picture of Koeman he is in orange)

COYR!
1

slynch added 15:08 - Jun 17
I think the title of this piece should be, Koemen are the men?
As above says; the future is bright the future is orange.
0

abingdonsaint added 19:09 - Jun 17
Interesting piece, which I agree with in parts!

Firstly, disappointed to lose Poch, who I think is seriously underrated by some on here, but Koeman ticks all the boxes as a replacement, although only time will tell of course. Once Cortese went, Poch was always likely to follow, and he stayed longer than I expected actually.

As regards selling our best players, there are two ways of looking at this. Nick is right in that all clubs are 'selling clubs' to a degree. Arsenal couldn't keep Van Persie, Tottenham couldn't keep Bale, and even Manure had to let Ronaldo go. Where I am with Montechristo though is that we have to be careful here as it is all about perception. None of the clubs I just mentioned are regarded as 'selling clubs' but we are. It is therefore very important going forward that this changes, and that we do everything possible to change that perception. If some of the fans still have it that cannot help! It is not all about money. For all his foibles, Cortese was very proactive in realising that it is difficult to keep players who want to leave, so he tried to create an ambitious, attractive environment so that they would not want to. The danger now is that if we start letting the best players go then others will see that as a lack of ambition and follow suit.

My last point with this is that it is not always easy to replace key players no matter how much money they bring in, and it is more important to strengthen the first team rather than the squad in my view. Given our commitment to youth, this means that anyone coming in must be significantly better than an academy product. That sort of quality costs money, so it is not about 'marquee' signings. It is simply that you get what you pay for in general. I would much rather bring in 2 or 3 quality additions than half a dozen squad players. Let's face it, Spurs got big money for Bale, but despite spending the money and, on paper, improving their squad, their best eleven is arguably weaker!

The reason there is speculation about us is partly due to the perceived uncertainty, which hopefully Koeman will solve, but also that we have a lot more excellent players than other clubs. If we can keep the majority, and add some real quality, there is no reason we cannot improve on last season......keep the faith!
0

cheltenhamsaint added 19:45 - Jun 17
First of all, Koeman gets a thumbs up for me. I was a fan of MP but he has gone, and we should thank him for the progress we made under his tenure.
Koeman has the CV to improve our status with a fresh approach to an existing squad. I accept that players move on, and that doesn't make us necessarily a selling club. More than one more to leave and I think it retains the "selling club" tag.
I fall between Saint Nick and Montecristo. The club is stronger than one or two players but to sell to a direct competitor, one that you are trying to overtake makes no business or footballing sense to me.
For example, if Lallana is adamant he wants CL football next season or the one after, and hands in a transfer request, then so be it. Plenty of European clubs that offer him that. Perhaps Zenit Saint Petersburg (and he could remain a Saint!). Yes, we may take a hit on the fee, but could protect ourselves with a significant sell on percentage, but he won't be making one of the teams above us more difficult to catch.
We do not have to sell him to the club of his choosing. With four years left on his contract we hold the key hand.
Maybe we would be cutting our nose off to spite our faces but, for once and at this point of our development, I think it is important to make a point to players and agents as to what a contract means when it is signed,
0


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 30 bloggers

Southampton Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2025