| RAF Fairford 16:53 - Sep 27 with 5323 views | KeithHaynes |
Trump
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |  |
| RAF Fairford on 13:56 - Sep 28 with 894 views | blackswan |
All British men in their 20s according to the BBC just hope none are new welsh |  | | |
| RAF Fairford on 15:30 - Sep 28 with 820 views | pencoedjack |
| RAF Fairford on 13:56 - Sep 28 by blackswan |
All British men in their 20s according to the BBC just hope none are new welsh |
I guess that is to appease those who believe we are letting too many people into the country.
They, or their parents, were probably granted asylum, yet they hate the country they live in and everything we stand for. |  | | |
| RAF Fairford on 15:38 - Sep 28 with 806 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| RAF Fairford on 15:30 - Sep 28 by pencoedjack |
I guess that is to appease those who believe we are letting too many people into the country.
They, or their parents, were probably granted asylum, yet they hate the country they live in and everything we stand for. |
Releasing one bit of information in isolation doesn't help it raises questions like where were they born? |  |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 15:50 - Sep 28 with 785 views | blackswan |
| RAF Fairford on 15:38 - Sep 28 by JACKMANANDBOY |
Releasing one bit of information in isolation doesn't help it raises questions like where were they born? |
Their passports may say they are British but their actions say otherwise.
Add treason to terrorism charges then | | | |
| RAF Fairford on 15:54 - Sep 28 with 776 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| RAF Fairford on 15:50 - Sep 28 by blackswan |
Their passports may say they are British but their actions say otherwise.
Add treason to terrorism charges then |
Looks like we are letting them out on bail.
You couldn't make this up | |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 15:57 - Sep 28 with 771 views | raynor94 |
| RAF Fairford on 15:54 - Sep 28 by JACKMANANDBOY |
Looks like we are letting them out on bail.
You couldn't make this up |
Im gobsmacked at them being released yet people from the village aren't allowed home yet what on earth is going on! |  |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 15:59 - Sep 28 with 765 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| RAF Fairford on 15:57 - Sep 28 by raynor94 |
Im gobsmacked at them being released yet people from the village aren't allowed home yet what on earth is going on! |
The Police say the investigation is ongoing, so let them out?!?
Obviously they couldn't find any plastic bottles that could be used as weapons. [Post edited 28 Sep 16:03]
| |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 16:32 - Sep 28 with 709 views | blackswan |
| RAF Fairford on 15:59 - Sep 28 by JACKMANANDBOY |
The Police say the investigation is ongoing, so let them out?!?
Obviously they couldn't find any plastic bottles that could be used as weapons. [Post edited 28 Sep 16:03]
|
Or a Stanley knife cause terrible damage to rubber
Bail wtf is happening to our country bet Donald will be impressed!
Obviously not considered flight risks then unbelievable | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| RAF Fairford on 16:36 - Sep 28 with 705 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| RAF Fairford on 15:57 - Sep 28 by raynor94 |
Im gobsmacked at them being released yet people from the village aren't allowed home yet what on earth is going on! |
We've got our priorities in the UK. | |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 16:37 - Sep 28 with 703 views | majorraglan |
| RAF Fairford on 15:59 - Sep 28 by JACKMANANDBOY |
The Police say the investigation is ongoing, so let them out?!?
Obviously they couldn't find any plastic bottles that could be used as weapons. [Post edited 28 Sep 16:03]
|
Based on the fact they’re being released so early it would suggest that the police have eliminated the possibility of it being a terrorist related incident and it’s possible that the men have done nothing wrong.
Under existing legislation police can initially hold a terrorism suspect for up to 48 hours before needing a warrant of further detention from a judicial authority, the initial 2 day period can be extended up to a maximum of 14 days so given those time lines, I suspect if the police and security services were satisfied that there were lines of enquiry to be pursued in relation to a terrorist incident the police etc would use up the detention clock and keep them in custody. [Post edited 28 Sep 23:23]
| | | |
| RAF Fairford on 16:41 - Sep 28 with 698 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| RAF Fairford on 16:37 - Sep 28 by majorraglan |
Based on the fact they’re being released so early it would suggest that the police have eliminated the possibility of it being a terrorist related incident and it’s possible that the men have done nothing wrong.
Under existing legislation police can initially hold a terrorism suspect for up to 48 hours before needing a warrant of further detention from a judicial authority, the initial 2 day period can be extended up to a maximum of 14 days so given those time lines, I suspect if the police and security services were satisfied that there were lines of enquiry to be pursued in relation to a terrorist incident the police etc would use up the detention clock and keep them in custody. [Post edited 28 Sep 23:23]
|
If running around outside a USAF base, a hundred miles from home at 1am, dressed in black wearing balaclavas is doing nothing wrong then I guess they were playing hide and seek.
[Post edited 28 Sep 16:52]
| |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 16:52 - Sep 28 with 684 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| RAF Fairford on 16:37 - Sep 28 by majorraglan |
Based on the fact they’re being released so early it would suggest that the police have eliminated the possibility of it being a terrorist related incident and it’s possible that the men have done nothing wrong.
Under existing legislation police can initially hold a terrorism suspect for up to 48 hours before needing a warrant of further detention from a judicial authority, the initial 2 day period can be extended up to a maximum of 14 days so given those time lines, I suspect if the police and security services were satisfied that there were lines of enquiry to be pursued in relation to a terrorist incident the police etc would use up the detention clock and keep them in custody. [Post edited 28 Sep 23:23]
|
|  |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 17:01 - Sep 28 with 670 views | blackswan |
| RAF Fairford on 16:37 - Sep 28 by majorraglan |
Based on the fact they’re being released so early it would suggest that the police have eliminated the possibility of it being a terrorist related incident and it’s possible that the men have done nothing wrong.
Under existing legislation police can initially hold a terrorism suspect for up to 48 hours before needing a warrant of further detention from a judicial authority, the initial 2 day period can be extended up to a maximum of 14 days so given those time lines, I suspect if the police and security services were satisfied that there were lines of enquiry to be pursued in relation to a terrorist incident the police etc would use up the detention clock and keep them in custody. [Post edited 28 Sep 23:23]
|
Arrested under the explosives act and according to Donald been under surveillance for some time all very strange | | | |
| RAF Fairford (n/t) on 17:10 - Sep 28 with 656 views | heatwave |
[Post edited 28 Sep 17:13]
|  | | |
| RAF Fairford (n/t) on 17:18 - Sep 28 with 644 views | AnotherJohn |
| RAF Fairford (n/t) on 17:10 - Sep 28 by heatwave |
[Post edited 28 Sep 17:13]
|
We need more information before reaching a conclusion but at face value this is another baffling case. | | | |
| RAF Fairford on 17:33 - Sep 28 with 631 views | majorraglan |
| RAF Fairford on 16:41 - Sep 28 by JACKMANANDBOY |
If running around outside a USAF base, a hundred miles from home at 1am, dressed in black wearing balaclavas is doing nothing wrong then I guess they were playing hide and seek.
[Post edited 28 Sep 16:52]
|
Maybe they were poaching rabbits - who knows.
The police would have had 2 days to deal with these suspects before going to a Magistrates Court for a warrant of further detention, under existing legislation, terrorism suspects can be detained for up to 14 days.
Why would they release people they genuinely suspected of terrorist offences after 36 hours when they have 14 days to progress the enquiry and deal with them ? Releasing the suspects doesn’t make sense unless the authorities are satisfied they aren’t involved in a terrorist incident.
Edit - Releasing the suspects on bail now will enable the police /security services to potentially NFA (No Further Action) the investigation at some point in the future with minimum press coverage etc and less embarrassment. IMHO the police were 100% right to take positive action and make the arrests, if things aren’t as they first appear so be it. [Post edited 28 Sep 18:08]
| | | |
| RAF Fairford on 17:51 - Sep 28 with 612 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| RAF Fairford on 17:33 - Sep 28 by majorraglan |
Maybe they were poaching rabbits - who knows.
The police would have had 2 days to deal with these suspects before going to a Magistrates Court for a warrant of further detention, under existing legislation, terrorism suspects can be detained for up to 14 days.
Why would they release people they genuinely suspected of terrorist offences after 36 hours when they have 14 days to progress the enquiry and deal with them ? Releasing the suspects doesn’t make sense unless the authorities are satisfied they aren’t involved in a terrorist incident.
Edit - Releasing the suspects on bail now will enable the police /security services to potentially NFA (No Further Action) the investigation at some point in the future with minimum press coverage etc and less embarrassment. IMHO the police were 100% right to take positive action and make the arrests, if things aren’t as they first appear so be it. [Post edited 28 Sep 18:08]
|
They say the investigation is ongoing, so who knows? | |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 17:56 - Sep 28 with 608 views | jacksfullaces |
nothing like 24 hours of your average joes deciding what has gone on based on skin colour and location ... | | | |
| RAF Fairford on 18:25 - Sep 28 with 582 views | blackswan |
| RAF Fairford on 17:56 - Sep 28 by jacksfullaces |
nothing like 24 hours of your average joes deciding what has gone on based on skin colour and location ... |
Or the potus stating these were people known to the security services yes I know he's not the most reliable source prehaps they were looking for badgers | | | |
| RAF Fairford on 20:21 - Sep 28 with 484 views | AnotherJohn |
| RAF Fairford on 18:25 - Sep 28 by blackswan |
Or the potus stating these were people known to the security services yes I know he's not the most reliable source prehaps they were looking for badgers |
Rabbits? Badgers? I know those comments are tongue in cheek, but I couldn't help thinking of my teenage experiences as a country boy. When we went "rabbiting" we didn't go mob-handed - just two or three people to cover both sides of hedges, We didn't drive 100 miles to get to the spot. We went in the early morning rather than at night. We didn't wear balaclavas. We did have at least one dog to mark active burrows and one or more ferrets. And if a group were taking the alternative route of "lamping" at night they would have been carrying firearms.
Returning to seriousness, this is a strange affair. [Post edited 28 Sep 20:49]
| | | |
| RAF Fairford on 20:50 - Sep 28 with 434 views | onehunglow |
Slash a dingy , custody
Organise mass death , bail
Anyone doubting politically influenced jurisprudence must not see this | |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 21:01 - Sep 28 with 424 views | Wingstandwood |
Trump 'surprised' by suspects' bail
US President Donald Trump says he is "surprised" five suspects were released on bail.
He says he would not have released them himself.
He says: "I'm surprised that they released them. I wouldn't have done that.
"We know everything about them. We would not have released them."
https://news.sky.com/story/fai |  |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 21:10 - Sep 28 with 412 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| RAF Fairford on 21:01 - Sep 28 by Wingstandwood |
Trump 'surprised' by suspects' bail
US President Donald Trump says he is "surprised" five suspects were released on bail.
He says he would not have released them himself.
He says: "I'm surprised that they released them. I wouldn't have done that.
"We know everything about them. We would not have released them."
https://news.sky.com/story/fai |
Releasing them could be a ploy, watch them closely, where they go, what they do, who they speak to. They won’t be able to fart without MI6 analysing it to see what they had for breakfast. | |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 21:15 - Sep 28 with 403 views | Wingstandwood |
It's a crazy one this one, some are even (are they allowed to do that?) speculating that it was a 'false flag' operation by the state that went wrong when a member of (that farmer) the general public happened to turn up unexpectedly and gatecrash a crafty case of a dirty trick in progress. I suppose claims like that aren't helped by the 'dodgy Iraq dossier' etc.
If you think that's bad wait for the political sleight of hand close to, and after the next Labour government budget!
 | |
| |
| RAF Fairford on 21:18 - Sep 28 with 396 views | Wingstandwood |
| RAF Fairford on 21:10 - Sep 28 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
Releasing them could be a ploy, watch them closely, where they go, what they do, who they speak to. They won’t be able to fart without MI6 analysing it to see what they had for breakfast. |
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.