| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal 21:15 - Jul 14 with 947 views | SaintsNews |
https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/
If you want to remove this post from the board index, just click the hide post icon below. To hide all our news posts click the ignore user icon under the avatar. |  | | |  |
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 21:43 - Jul 14 with 924 views | Saintsforeverj |
No point paying a loan fee. Save the money for a permanent player. I'm not convinced that such a young player that rarely gets in the Man U team will be good enough. They might as well get a cover player on a free. | |
| |
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 08:54 - Jul 15 with 788 views | Sadoldgit |
It’s not the loan fee that bothers me, it’s the reported weekly wage of £65k! |  | | |
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 09:12 - Jul 15 with 782 views | SonicBoom |
I'd look elsewhere.
Huge wages for such an inexperienced lad. Plus we get to develop him for Man United and are expected to pay heavily for the privilege. |  | | |
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 09:51 - Jul 15 with 752 views | Sadoldgit |
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 09:12 - Jul 15 by SonicBoom |
I'd look elsewhere.
Huge wages for such an inexperienced lad. Plus we get to develop him for Man United and are expected to pay heavily for the privilege. |
Totally agree. If United are happy for us to give him game time and help him develop over this season, then they should be happy to pay part of his wages as he is still their player and if he turns into another KWP we will have done them a massive favour. As it stands, barring injuries, he will spend this next season sitting on the bench again. How is that helping him develop as a player? A loan arrangement is a win win, but United wanted to screw us financially too. If they want us to cover the wages, then ditch the loan fee. | | | |
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 10:14 - Jul 15 with 734 views | saints__fan__73 |
Why would a player who is a backup take a loan to a club to be a backup? |  |
| |
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 10:36 - Jul 15 with 709 views | Sadoldgit |
Given the way that Ralph uses wing backs, I assume that he would get more game time here. | | | |
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 10:47 - Jul 15 with 699 views | Berber |
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 09:51 - Jul 15 by Sadoldgit |
Totally agree. If United are happy for us to give him game time and help him develop over this season, then they should be happy to pay part of his wages as he is still their player and if he turns into another KWP we will have done them a massive favour. As it stands, barring injuries, he will spend this next season sitting on the bench again. How is that helping him develop as a player? A loan arrangement is a win win, but United wanted to screw us financially too. If they want us to cover the wages, then ditch the loan fee. |
Spot on |  |
| |
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 12:22 - Jul 15 with 637 views | dwayne_dibley |
they should tell manure to analise |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Manchester United Demand For Loan Fee Could Scupper Deal on 12:39 - Jul 15 with 625 views | Kennington |
Seems reasonable to me. If he comes for a season £2m is surely less than a quarter of his transfer value on an equivalent 4 year contract, ie he’s worth more than £8m. Think that’s a better more modern way of looking at loans, and considering the duration of the loan representing the proportion of the player’s transfer value. Obviously there’s no resale value, but if we want resale value we shouldn’t be doing loan deals. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
