| Southampton V Stoke City The Verdict 09:25 - Aug 25 with 1156 views | SaintsNews |
https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/
If you want to remove this post from the board index, just click the hide post icon below. To hide all our news posts click the ignore user icon under the avatar. |  | | |  |
| Southampton V Stoke City The Verdict on 09:51 - Aug 25 with 1085 views | Butty101 |
I know Baz is one of your favorites, but he should of done better with both goals. He pushed the ball straight to the stoke player for the first. The 2nd one he should be saving but he is to far over. From that angle the forward should not be scoring. It was the same last week at Ipswich when from a very acute angle they hit the post. Baz rarely pulls off a blinding save and still looks to small in goal. |  |
| |
| Southampton V Stoke City The Verdict on 09:57 - Aug 25 with 1059 views | SaintNick |
| Southampton V Stoke City The Verdict on 09:51 - Aug 25 by Butty101 |
I know Baz is one of your favorites, but he should of done better with both goals. He pushed the ball straight to the stoke player for the first. The 2nd one he should be saving but he is to far over. From that angle the forward should not be scoring. It was the same last week at Ipswich when from a very acute angle they hit the post. Baz rarely pulls off a blinding save and still looks to small in goal. |
I think you are harsh on the first goal, it was hit at hime from close range, it mah have taken a slight deflection, he did well to stop it.
The second was a cross hit shot, I can see your point on this in that it went across him, but it went in as close to the post as you can get, the scorer had time and space to pick his shot, from the tv pictures shown just from the half way line camera gallery it is hard to say whether he got his angles wrong or right, but the Stoke man had a clear shot, so perhaps he needed to be guarding his near post a bit more than he would if he had a defender cutting off that angle and giving him only one part of the goal to shoot at.
I'm not sticking up for him, I looked at it myself and couldnt really tell either way |  |
| Satisfying The Bloodlust Of The Masses In Peacetime |
| |
| Southampton V Stoke City The Verdict on 10:15 - Aug 25 with 958 views | Butty101 |
| Southampton V Stoke City The Verdict on 09:57 - Aug 25 by SaintNick |
I think you are harsh on the first goal, it was hit at hime from close range, it mah have taken a slight deflection, he did well to stop it.
The second was a cross hit shot, I can see your point on this in that it went across him, but it went in as close to the post as you can get, the scorer had time and space to pick his shot, from the tv pictures shown just from the half way line camera gallery it is hard to say whether he got his angles wrong or right, but the Stoke man had a clear shot, so perhaps he needed to be guarding his near post a bit more than he would if he had a defender cutting off that angle and giving him only one part of the goal to shoot at.
I'm not sticking up for him, I looked at it myself and couldnt really tell either way |
Baz looks like a lost little boy in goal. Nearly every shot on target goes . The stoke keeper looks intimidating. I suspect he is also capable of organizing his defense | |
| |
| Southampton V Stoke City The Verdict on 10:18 - Aug 25 with 949 views | Southamptonfan |
| Southampton V Stoke City The Verdict on 10:15 - Aug 25 by Butty101 |
Baz looks like a lost little boy in goal. Nearly every shot on target goes . The stoke keeper looks intimidating. I suspect he is also capable of organizing his defense |
I think I am right in saying that Stoke bought their goalkeeper from Rotherham for 2 million. He was that excellent goalkeeper who was brilliant for Rotherham the year they went down. A proper experienced goalkeeper in this league, at a cheap price. [Post edited 25 Aug 10:44]
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
