| Southampton Land First Signing Of Transfer Deadline Day on 10:16 - Sep 1 with 1140 views | 1teeminants |
Brilliant signing. My Burnley supporting mate said he’s quality. Very happy with that😀 |  |
|  |
| Southampton Land First Signing Of Transfer Deadline Day on 14:52 - Sep 1 with 872 views | GRIM |
| Southampton Land First Signing Of Transfer Deadline Day on 10:16 - Sep 1 by 1teeminants |
Brilliant signing. My Burnley supporting mate said he’s quality. Very happy with that😀 |
If he's that good why didn't Burnley try to sign him permanently after his loan spell.
That's not a criticism because I've never seen him play , it's just an observation. |  | | |
| Southampton Land First Signing Of Transfer Deadline Day on 15:47 - Sep 1 with 839 views | felly1 |
All kicking off now.. Rumours abound that It's Che to Stay.. Yay!!
Stewart deal maybe off??
Roberts deal maybe off?? | | | |
| Southampton Land First Signing Of Transfer Deadline Day on 15:51 - Sep 1 with 826 views | saint22 |
| Southampton Land First Signing Of Transfer Deadline Day on 15:47 - Sep 1 by felly1 |
All kicking off now.. Rumours abound that It's Che to Stay.. Yay!!
Stewart deal maybe off??
Roberts deal maybe off?? |
That would be typical saints
Wait until the last day, and we end up as we were | | | |
| Southampton Land First Signing Of Transfer Deadline Day on 17:25 - Sep 1 with 731 views | LondonSaint76 |
| Southampton Land First Signing Of Transfer Deadline Day on 14:52 - Sep 1 by GRIM |
If he's that good why didn't Burnley try to sign him permanently after his loan spell.
That's not a criticism because I've never seen him play , it's just an observation. |
I would venture to suggest for much the same reason Tella is in Germany not Burnley, they were too tight fisted to pay anything like what the player is worth. If you look at what Burnley were offering for Tella compared to what he went for then I would reckon Man City would have just told Burnley to go away and not come back until they were prepared to table a proper offer. That’s just my assumption but if correct it would explain the reason why he’s not gone there permanently. Great from our point of view though - and it also means we are not paying an inflated over the top fee for Wood from bitter Swansea. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
