| Rangers Announce Signing Of Dan Neil 11:19 - Jul 1 with 1538 views | SaintNick | We can cross him off our wish list now, a bit of a disappointment |  |
| Satisfying The Bloodlust Of The Masses In Peacetime |
| |  |
| Rangers Announce Signing Of Dan Neil on 11:41 - Jul 1 with 1466 views | PatfromPoole | Or maybe we pulled out of signing him as someone we thought would leave is perhaps instead going to stay (?). I would be surprised if Rangers offered him more money; there is pish all money in the Scottish League. Ipswich fans weren't overly enamoured with Neil, so this may not be too disappointing. |  |
|  |
| Rangers Announce Signing Of Dan Neil on 13:58 - Jul 1 with 1319 views | darthvader |
| Rangers Announce Signing Of Dan Neil on 11:41 - Jul 1 by PatfromPoole | Or maybe we pulled out of signing him as someone we thought would leave is perhaps instead going to stay (?). I would be surprised if Rangers offered him more money; there is pish all money in the Scottish League. Ipswich fans weren't overly enamoured with Neil, so this may not be too disappointing. |
Just another free agent so not that bothered , best of luck in jockanese land |  |
|  |
| Rangers Announce Signing Of Dan Neil on 14:40 - Jul 1 with 1284 views | GRIM |
| Rangers Announce Signing Of Dan Neil on 11:41 - Jul 1 by PatfromPoole | Or maybe we pulled out of signing him as someone we thought would leave is perhaps instead going to stay (?). I would be surprised if Rangers offered him more money; there is pish all money in the Scottish League. Ipswich fans weren't overly enamoured with Neil, so this may not be too disappointing. |
Agreed, he's not that good if he couldn't get regular games at Ipswich. We need to bring in players at least as good if not better than the ones we have. He's probably chosen to go to Scotland because he's guaranteed a regular game which he wouldn't have got here. The only reason we went for him was because he was a freebie. [Post edited 1 Jul 14:45]
|  | |  |
| |