 | Forum
Reply | Investment update
at 08:29 25 Apr 2024
It's good that the Trust volunteers can do so successfully |
| Forum
Reply | Investment update
at 20:44 24 Apr 2024
That's what i was getting at
Have the Trust been able to identify all shareholders, whether Trust members or not? And if so, why can't the club? |
| Forum
Reply | Investment update
at 19:48 24 Apr 2024
The Trust has taken up this issue with an email this evening
A positive thing to do. Just wondering if it's addressed to Trust members who're shareholders, or all shareholders? |
| Forum
Reply | Investment update
at 10:01 24 Apr 2024
Yes, thankyou James, it was read and noted
Get those brooms ready... |
| Forum
Reply | Investment update
at 08:21 24 Apr 2024
You've done all you can, as many have noted previously
New brooms need to be swept, sooner rather than later |
| Forum
Reply | Investment update
at 21:14 22 Apr 2024
Yes, that's the takeaway from the email
Looks like a matter of making things watertight and it seems likely the Ogdens will have had major input into how this has been formulated so let's hope it doesn't lead to any unnecessary delays |
| Forum
Reply | Refwatch: Southend United v Rochdale
at 12:42 21 Apr 2024
I think most of us understood what you meant by a "prove it" year
Your point about "people voting with their feet" is the key one |
| Forum
Reply | Investment update
at 11:31 21 Apr 2024
If we look at the situation in 2009 when we had a tax bill to pay. we sold ALF to Rotherham for (i think) £70k which could be deemed well below his true market valuation (especially given his subsequent career). The sale was required or we could've been handed a winding up order by the tax authorities, or so the narrative was put forward at the time (i stand to be corrected)
If such a situation were to occur going forward from here, would we be required to sell at below market valuation to pay an urgent bill... or not? It very much remains to be seen |
| Forum
Reply | Investment update
at 17:49 19 Apr 2024
Whilst i've expressed 'reservations' about our current leadership off and on the pitch, i can fully support this statement for the following reason: it's coming from a level of expertise, professionalism and indeed, creativity that i never imagined would become involved in Dale
[Post edited 19 Apr 17:57]
|
| Forum
Reply | Fa Cup replays
at 17:40 19 Apr 2024
In addition, to go in at half time at 1-1 and with Hendo hitting the post after we'd drawn level was very enjoyable, irrespective of the eventual outcome
I felt as proud of Dale during that half time interval as at any other time up to that point |
| Forum
Reply | Fa Cup replays
at 20:57 18 Apr 2024
Likely they wanted to push this through ahead of a regulator being established |
| Forum
Reply | Steve Evans.
at 21:42 17 Apr 2024
Just wait till they win their last three games on the bounce |
| Forum
Reply | Steve Evans.
at 21:16 17 Apr 2024
I take it you're referring to his several chins? |
| Forum
Reply | Boreham Wood at home take 3!
at 18:34 17 Apr 2024
We shall see; you may well be right, depending on the initial injection of financial support
Whether it's in the immediate or medium term, new leadership is required, so let's keep that to the forefront rather than looking for reasons why it mightn't happen right now |
| Forum
Reply | Boreham Wood at home take 3!
at 18:03 17 Apr 2024
That's a fair enough point of view
Rather than having to piss in or out though, surely the better solution would be to reach an agreement with the Ogdens that enables him to exit with a decent chunk of his money back and make way for a new broom [Post edited 17 Apr 18:04]
|
| Forum
Reply | Boreham Wood at home take 3!
at 15:44 17 Apr 2024
I'd agree with much of that, but just to clarify: do you think he will continue as Chairman or that he should continue in that role? |
| Forum
Reply | Boreham Wood at home take 3!
at 13:33 17 Apr 2024
This is precisely what is needed
Surely, the last 3 years would've jaded the appetite of anyone as chairman, let alone someone 'encouraged' into a role he didn't understand (self-admittedly, btw)
A new chairman and refreshed boardroom is the absolute minimum bedrock upon which the future of Dale could be built. To that end, i'm not sure SG's the right person to be overseeing the recruitment of such a vital role, having little background in or apparent insight into what's required
All such appointments, whilst vital, should await the outcome of due process with the Ogdens. The only exception would be if SG has already agreed not to be part of the recruitment process other than advertising it |
| | D_Alien
|
Site Scores| Forum Votes: | 9681 | | Comment Votes: | 0 | | Prediction League: | 0 | | TOTAL: | 9681 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.