| News Comment | Southampton V Wolverhampton Wanderers The Verdict at 11:31:52
OK Archer as well but without anybody crossing the ball with any frequency any forward, that manages to reach the oppo penalty area, is unlikely to score. We have to rely on rare breaks or defenders scoring from set pieces. |
| News Comment | Southampton V Wolverhampton Wanderers The Verdict at 11:25:55
"Many of us shouted loudly for a proven goal scorer during the summer break and we ended up with Stewart!" That was 2 years ago; we got Diaz and Cornett this summer. Is there any wonder we're not scoring goals, along with Martin's genius possession style of play? |
| News Comment | Southampton Already Have Their Target To Replace Russell Martin at 12:34:51
"The fight we are now in? We’ve played 4 games!! Sure we need to change results and I agree that Martin looks like he is struggling to know how to attack the opposition but if we win today, will the same be said of McKenna? 5 games in, no win, only 2 points? I do have concerns but when you think we’re not up to speed yet, this seems worse than the knee jerk reactions you accused fans of with Ralph when he had lost 9-0 twice.. Favourtism indeed extends to this website and the pen of the majority of articles. As much as there’s aspects I don’t like about Martin, you have to give him a proper chance to show what he can do with a fit and ready squad which was only assembled fully one game ago! I don’t see how this article is helpful, again, you are trying to disrupt the club and stir people up when we need everyone pulling in the same direction to survive in this league. 4 games in is not enough time to make a fair judgement despite the poor start, we dominated against quality United players last week until the penalty and we have all seen improvement." The truth hurts but one day you'll have to live with it or die failing. I think that's a fair report - conjecture is part of Nick's job let alone the fan's prerogative. Hassenhutl should have been sacked because of two 9-0 losses in consecutive seasons, that was an absolute embarrassment and disgrace for the club and the fans, whilst he also used a pathetic, useless system that failed ( admittedly we brought in a lot of inadequate players - SR's fault). Martin's system is clearly doomed to failure and relegation seems inevitable with Martin's current approach. Nick's simply making us aware of the possibilities if Saints lose their next few games. As someone else said, SR's prerogative is to staying the Premier Division. Hopefully they can avoid this by sacking Martin - unless he manages to see the light and change his ways ( we may still not survive with the players we have). I have followed Eustace's managerial career and he does indeed seem to be effective at his job where ever he's been which couldn't be said for Martin when we signed him. We must be realistic fighters not a delusional losers and frankly, I've had enough and want us to have a fighting chance, and a competent approach, to staying up this year. I'd be happy with Potter, Moyes or Eustace- at least they appear to have some common sense and football nous. Let's see. I bet if we don't gain any points in the next few games, a lot of the 'folks' on here will be calling for Martin's head instead of bleating about giving him a chance. |
| News Comment | Russell Martin Has Plenty Of Options For Manchester United Game But Will He Use Them at 10:32:50
Whilst I agree with everything else you've said, I don't think you have to sneer to say 'tippy-tappy' tactics because that's what it was and frankly if we continue playing that way in the Premier Division then we're going to be relegated. Say things the way they are, don't skirt around an issue and then you can progress, have an honest debate and make the necessary changes for the good. That's how you improve. If there's some hyperbole there, ignore it because you still have to move forward. Fans are passionate that's what a fan is, a 'fanatic'. Effectively you're saying the same thing Nick - clear the ball when you need to in dangerous areas. It's not complicated algebra. How Martin hasn't figured this out yet as a professional, is bewildering to at least half the fan base. My team for Saturday, in a 4-4-2 formation is, if fit of course: Ramsdale, Sugawara, Bednarek, THB, KWL, Downes, Oguchukwhu, Fernandes, Dibbling, Archer, Diaz. |
| News Comment | The Solution Is Clear For Russell Martin If He Is To Stay In His Job at 11:59:47
The three weeks after the next two you mean Nick. Fair comments and I agree about Stephens - in all reality, though, many like him as a captain , member of the squad and man - including myself, he should not be first choice defender in the Premier League. However, if we played with two centre-halves I would see him as a capable back-up. That to me is short and long of it. However, I really think the system is to blame and Martin has to change the system. You purchase ball playing midfielders to play the ball around not defenders and goalkeepers - their job is to stop attacks and shots around the penalty area and to get rid of the ball as quickly as possible. It really shouldn't be rocket science. Sure the better backs can pass the ball out effectively and that does have to come into the equation in the Premier league but there's a difference between that and less than effective ball-playing defenders knocking the ball around their own penalty box. Barcelona, Madrid, Man City and Arsenal can do to because on the whole those defenders are excellent ball players. We simply can not afford players of that calibre and so, ergo, we're not going to be able to knock the ball around. We have to play to our strengths of our best players, rather than get the players to play to a devised/designed system, and make adjustments when necessary. You don't have to be a manager to see this, you just need commons sense and decades of watching football. Martin was pragmatic in making the right changes for the play-offs, it was a critical situation, but than why does he persist we his tippy-tappy defensive system against superior teams in the Premier League? Doesn't he understand we have to win matches ?That is very curious to me. He'll definitely have to change in the next three matches to get any points but that 's going to mean a fundamental rethink in team loyalties. I think Fernandes, Archer, Ugochukwa and Dibbling should all be brought in. There's two weeks to integrate them into a new system Russell! BE great if it happens but I won't hold my breath. |
| News Comment | Justin Bijlow Fails Southampton Medical at 21:46:37
"This is a big blow to Southampton's hopes of staying up, unless a truly class keeper is signed, then it is hard to see how we can survive." But we need three players if we're going to stay up: goalie, creative centre mid and a proper goal scoring centre forward. Come to think of it, didn't I say this at the start of the transfer window? Nothing's changed. |
| News Comment | Southampton V Lazio The Verdict at 22:34:58
Here's hoping Charley stays but learns to control that temper. Maybe a bit of a result for us - him getting involved in a fracas. |
| News Comment | Southampton V Oxford United The Verdict at 12:30:49
All very well being decent and generous about our squad but the Premier League and teams aren't that merciful. We'll be taken to task immediately without mercy. Better to face up to reality and kick the management up the backside - it's our only resort as fans - and after all they're certainly reimbursed well for it. Tell the management: start proving you're capable of running a Premier League club. The rest of us would get kicked out of a job if we weren't up to scratch, even a crappy job. There's certainly far too much leeway given to management when players that just aren't good enough and constantly get cudgeled. The constant filling of the squad up with mediocrity just doesn't won't hack it. |
| News Comment | Southampton V Oxford United The Verdict at 11:11:52
I thought McCarthy was at fault for the second goal. He seemed to get down too slowly for a Prem keeper's quality and the ball went under his hand or at least within touching distance. Two years contract was madness. If he's keeper this season we're going down. |
| News Comment | Southampton V Stoke City The Verdict at 12:58:23
ŤSorry, we simply need a new manager. This guy has simply proved he hasn't got what ugly takes at the final hurdle. OK the team were great on their npn losing streak but we're we ever convinced that they were serious contenders. I don't think so. In that period the players has some togetherness, and there was a fairly consistent team. The centre back pairing of HB and Bednarek had a great deal do with this, wholt Stu Armstrong , Adam Armstrong were playing consistently well. That was down to the players not the manager. When it comes to the time when a sensible, clear head is needed, we don't get it. Think of the way McMebemy and Bates operated. Unfortunately Martin couldn't hold a candle to them. |
| News Comment | Alex McCarthy Or Joe Lumley That Is The Question For Russell Martin at 10:48:31
Martin had to have a good reason for playing McCarthy over Lumley but he didn't because Martin said he just wanted to see how McCarthy 'got on'. An unprofessional decision, in my humble opinion, considering we needed to win the game against a play-off contender. That for me was a risk too far and totally unwarranted. Although Saints played well, Martin got lucky as Preston might as well not have turned up. It'll be different against Cardiff on Saturday. |
| News Comment | What Brought About Russell Martin U Turns Against Preston at 13:55:15
Occasionally, and by a lot of it is by luck or being forced into it, Martin finds the right combinations. Last night was one of those nights. So if Martin's got any sense whatsoever, he'll start with the same team but swopping Lumley for McCarthy. Pick the best team possible and make changes from the bench when necessary not from the starting line-up. Credit to Manning for his last two performances but then again he is a left back. |
| News Comment | Southampton V Coventry City The Verdict at 14:14:49
A classic Russell Martin Jekyll and Hyde performance and the players also have this Jekyll and Hyde aspect: positive, show our prowess and potential in the first half; second half sitting back, more defensive tippy tappy and dangerously vulnerable. Frankly we're lucky we got away with a win in the end. All this to me shows that in reality Martin isn't a very confident manager. He overthinks his strategies, tinkers too much ( the Tinkerman, Ranieri, tinkered for Leicester but he had world class players to tinker with) and that we don't have many consistently top quality players. Martin listening to the critics was good, but this was only half done and sometimes the wrong choices are made; putting Stephens in at centre back but leaving out Bednarek. That doesn't matter too much to me because Jack usually plays well here and here played well tonight, rampaging forward on occasions and poking the odd decent ball forwards. But why break up the record breaking centre half pairing of THB and Bednarek - it smacks of unconfident decision choices. When Saints don't have Armstrong in the starting line-up we miss a large amount of creativity and goal threat. OK he doesn't seem to be able to play 90 minutes but at least leave him on, if fit, for 75 minutes because he's always capable of creating a chance. Fraser I thought was ineffective and Suleman might have been more of a threat with his pace. Adams was probably exhausted after his efforts but unfortunately moving Armstrong back into the centre doesn't seem to work especially when he's much more effective coming in from the right - where's he's scored most of his goals and been successful. Mara still flatters to deceive for me but then again he rarely gets a string of games. This season would have been much better spent, as I said at the start, with him going on loan to get as much first team football as possible. Hey ho, we march on. |
| News Comment | Defence Is The Best Form Of Defence at 12:17:58
Martin really doesn't have a plan B, he just deals with the situation sometimes in a skewed way according to biases that are not based on solid reasoning. It's been said many times recently but use 'round pegs for round holes' not square pegs for round holes. It's obvious but Martin can't see and/or stubbornly won't apply the logic that most fans can now see. Over the decade or so most fans also realise that Stephens can only operate effectively in one position - centre half. Other clubs also know this because whenever Stephens is out of position then that area is easily targeted and leaves Saints with a crucial weakness. Don't get me wrong, I think that Stephens is a reasonably good centre half (and I thought was one of our best players against Middleborough - but, and this is my point, in his accustomed centre half role). That should be his playing role in the squad and presently that should be as a replacement if THB or Bednarek, who are clearly our best centre-half pairing, aren't available. Martin complicates something that should be very simple. We simply don't have the defensive quality to tinker with positional changes.. |
Please log in to use all the site's facilities | | Flamingbankers
|
Site ScoresForum Votes: | 18 | Comment Votes: | 106 | Prediction League: | 3 | TOTAL: | 127 |
|