Forum | 5 at the back by cocklebreath

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

5 at the back 19:31 - Dec 26 with 745 views

F()ck off. I don’t want a lumbering shit centre back moving into a 3 in midfield, I want a midfielder in midfield you utter clown .just f()ck off

Poll:

Who is the biggest c*nt?

5 at the back on 19:49 - Dec 26 with 657 views

grumpy

33 goals conceded,

5 at the back on 19:51 - Dec 26 with 648 views

Southamptonfan

Nothing changes whilst Sport Republic are here. They like yes men, who are young and inexperienced so that they do as they are told and question nothing. We are stuck with Tonda, unless it gets a terrible situation like it did with Still. Then the next young hipster manager comes in.

Poll:

Should Will Still be sacked?

5 at the back on 19:56 - Dec 26 with 626 views

cocklebreath

But why would these SR c()nts insist on a back 5? I am confused.

Poll:

Who is the biggest c*nt?

5 at the back on 20:00 - Dec 26 with 613 views

cocklebreath

Here’s a decent team
Not baz
Not manning-THB-wood-wellie
Jander-Downes
Leo-azziz-fellows
Armstrong

Probably one of the best teams in the championship

Poll:

Who is the biggest c*nt?

5 at the back on 15:51 - Dec 31 with 268 views

cocklebreath

Come on hungry eyes you know it makes sense, back 4 tomorrow

Poll:

Who is the biggest c*nt?

5 at the back on 21:46 - Dec 31 with 97 views

HytheFerrytales

My view is that going to back 4 is not a switch flicking move. It requires significant changes to personnel and quite a few role changes.

Even if we select the right CB's ( most on here think they are all shit) you still need 2 "traditional" FB's...we got any ??

Add in the need for significant changes in midfield shape and the wide attackers' roles in the absence of wing back support.

I wouldn't fancy the next 3 games using "on the job" trainees in a new idea.

Summary...going to back four in the run up to the Fishy Park fixture has low risk-reward .potential.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread