| Banning Twitter 08:07 - Jan 9 with 1808 views | Dr_Winston |
If you think Starmer and Co give two shits about Grok images, then I've got some magic beans to sell you. They can't control what people say on it, so they want it banned. This is censorship. Plain and simple.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/art |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |  |
| Banning Twitter on 09:09 - Jan 9 with 999 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
People will find ways around censorship, the internet is too dynamic, shut one door and another door appears. |  |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 11:03 - Jan 9 with 960 views | Whiterockin |
| Banning Twitter on 09:09 - Jan 9 by JACKMANANDBOY |
People will find ways around censorship, the internet is too dynamic, shut one door and another door appears. |
As long as there are VPNS censorship is pretty pointless unless it is worldwide. [Post edited 9 Jan 11:04]
|  | | |
| Banning Twitter on 11:10 - Jan 9 with 955 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
In an early episode of the office, an email is going around with David Brent’s face superimposed onto a woman’s naked body with two men performing an act on him. That show released 25 years ago this year, they were probably using a dial up connection and had computers the size of houses that could barely run Minesweeper.
The use of technology to undress people not a new problem created explicitly by AI. Perverts are always gonna pervert. The creation of these images to deliberately humiliate or degrade people should have always been illegal, to my knowledge it is. To ban an entire platform because a few sick individuals use it for nefarious reasons is not addressing the root cause. They’ll move onto other platforms. As the OP says this is all about censorship because people online are not particularly complimentary about the government in recent times and they don’t have any control over it. |  |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 12:08 - Jan 9 with 935 views | Demitrius |
This has got Starmer's fingerprints all over it. It is sinister and Orwellian.
He is apparently very thin skinned so all those hundreds of AI memes ridiculing him and his pathetic excuse of a government will no doubt have got his goat.
X is also the go to platform for the anti-woke brigade so has long been in the Left's crosshairs... |  |
| “Cunnilingus and Psychiatry brought us to this …” |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 12:13 - Jan 9 with 919 views | onehunglow |
And we thought Johnson was bad
This cretin is the pits and he’s hardly started
Regrets, I’ve had a few |  |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 12:22 - Jan 9 with 918 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| Banning Twitter on 12:08 - Jan 9 by Demitrius |
This has got Starmer's fingerprints all over it. It is sinister and Orwellian.
He is apparently very thin skinned so all those hundreds of AI memes ridiculing him and his pathetic excuse of a government will no doubt have got his goat.
X is also the go to platform for the anti-woke brigade so has long been in the Left's crosshairs... |
We’ve moved on from cartoons and puppets now. AI will see the next level of cutting satire. Saw a great one of the US army abseiling their way into Downing Street to take Starmer away Maduro style, only to find him in bed with the three Ukrainian lads who firebombed his house.
Again they want to ban it because they can’t control it and don’t like being ridiculed. | |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 13:47 - Jan 9 with 871 views | Boundy |
| Banning Twitter on 12:22 - Jan 9 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
We’ve moved on from cartoons and puppets now. AI will see the next level of cutting satire. Saw a great one of the US army abseiling their way into Downing Street to take Starmer away Maduro style, only to find him in bed with the three Ukrainian lads who firebombed his house.
Again they want to ban it because they can’t control it and don’t like being ridiculed. |
Nor should they ever be in a position to ban it, the days of private eye lampooning public figures has moved on , even today’s version of spitting image is child like compared the stuff that’s produced today. People are totally fed up with the lies and policies being foisted upon them and at the moment the only way we have to fight back is to ridicule those who rule us. | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 14:09 - Jan 9 with 852 views | Gwyn737 |
I think it’s more a knee jerk reaction to the recent trend of sexualising young girls by under a picture of a child asking the question ‘show this photo in a clear bikini’.
This is a bad thing isn’t it?
Another current fad is asking Grok to provide a list of the 10 biggest spreaders of misinformation on X:
| | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Banning Twitter on 14:32 - Jan 9 with 831 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Banning Twitter on 13:47 - Jan 9 by Boundy |
Nor should they ever be in a position to ban it, the days of private eye lampooning public figures has moved on , even today’s version of spitting image is child like compared the stuff that’s produced today. People are totally fed up with the lies and policies being foisted upon them and at the moment the only way we have to fight back is to ridicule those who rule us. |
It's the same PM calling for immediate action that has resisted and kicked down the road the Grooming Gangs inquiry, disgusting hypocrisy. | |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 15:51 - Jan 9 with 783 views | Demitrius |
| Banning Twitter on 14:09 - Jan 9 by Gwyn737 |
I think it’s more a knee jerk reaction to the recent trend of sexualising young girls by under a picture of a child asking the question ‘show this photo in a clear bikini’.
This is a bad thing isn’t it?
Another current fad is asking Grok to provide a list of the 10 biggest spreaders of misinformation on X:
|
Is it?
I may be misinterpreting your words/intent here
Sexualising kids is abhorhent but the cynic in me says they are doing this to clip dissent against their shitty government... | |
| “Cunnilingus and Psychiatry brought us to this …” |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 16:28 - Jan 9 with 758 views | Gwyn737 |
| Banning Twitter on 15:51 - Jan 9 by Demitrius |
Is it?
I may be misinterpreting your words/intent here
Sexualising kids is abhorhent but the cynic in me says they are doing this to clip dissent against their shitty government... |
They were two separate points - I should have been clearer. | | | |
| Banning Twitter on 16:42 - Jan 9 with 747 views | Dr_Winston |
| Banning Twitter on 14:09 - Jan 9 by Gwyn737 |
I think it’s more a knee jerk reaction to the recent trend of sexualising young girls by under a picture of a child asking the question ‘show this photo in a clear bikini’.
This is a bad thing isn’t it?
Another current fad is asking Grok to provide a list of the 10 biggest spreaders of misinformation on X:
|
If they were targeting all AI image makers capable of this rather than the one that happens to belong to a Social Media network owned by Elon Musk I could buy that. However as they're not the real reason for it is more transparent than a glass of spring water.
I certainly agree that images of this type are abhorrent and those guilty of making them should serve long sentences. | |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 16:56 - Jan 9 with 732 views | Gwyn737 |
| Banning Twitter on 16:42 - Jan 9 by Dr_Winston |
If they were targeting all AI image makers capable of this rather than the one that happens to belong to a Social Media network owned by Elon Musk I could buy that. However as they're not the real reason for it is more transparent than a glass of spring water.
I certainly agree that images of this type are abhorrent and those guilty of making them should serve long sentences. |
It’s the biggest platform in the world, masquerading as a social media site.
It makes sense to try and block criminal content.
It’s always been a sewer, the last few weeks have plummeted to new depths. | | | |
| Banning Twitter on 17:06 - Jan 9 with 725 views | Dr_Winston |
| Banning Twitter on 16:56 - Jan 9 by Gwyn737 |
It’s the biggest platform in the world, masquerading as a social media site.
It makes sense to try and block criminal content.
It’s always been a sewer, the last few weeks have plummeted to new depths. |
It is a social media site regardless of whether you like the content. Just as Bluesky is in the opposite direction, albeit far less popular. | |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 17:15 - Jan 9 with 708 views | Gwyn737 |
| Banning Twitter on 17:06 - Jan 9 by Dr_Winston |
It is a social media site regardless of whether you like the content. Just as Bluesky is in the opposite direction, albeit far less popular. |
It’s stops becoming social media when the algorithm takes over. An individual has little agency these days.
Facebook is much the same but more focussed on advertising and less on 13 year olds in swimwear. | | | |
| Banning Twitter on 17:41 - Jan 9 with 693 views | max936 |
Further proof that Starmer has communist leanings.
Most hated PM I can ever remember, there's been a few of course but he's the top dog. |  |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 17:44 - Jan 9 with 687 views | max936 |
| Banning Twitter on 13:47 - Jan 9 by Boundy |
Nor should they ever be in a position to ban it, the days of private eye lampooning public figures has moved on , even today’s version of spitting image is child like compared the stuff that’s produced today. People are totally fed up with the lies and policies being foisted upon them and at the moment the only way we have to fight back is to ridicule those who rule us. |
There are still those that'll lap it all up and still support him, you really couldn't make it up. | |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 17:48 - Jan 9 with 680 views | max936 |
I don't do Twitter and never will, I use facebook though because of the hobbies I've got, so I couldn't careless what happens to that media platform. | |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 18:01 - Jan 9 with 675 views | Gwyn737 |
| Banning Twitter on 17:48 - Jan 9 by max936 |
I don't do Twitter and never will, I use facebook though because of the hobbies I've got, so I couldn't careless what happens to that media platform. |
I think users that are anti child porn would be happy to see measures taken. | | | |
| Banning Twitter on 18:35 - Jan 9 with 647 views | AnotherJohn |
I'm not that keen on X, but do post occasionally. As far as my feed goes, the generality of posts are not as anti-woke as they might be, with a plethora of "rejoining the EU", pro-Starmer, and pro-SNP posts, but I would not support banning the platform.
What strikes me is that censorship of fake body images may become more difficult as AI evolves into AGI. The difference is that artificial general intelligence is not optimised on a specific domain, but is trained on a full range of expert knowledge, and will be capable via machine learning to move beyond the training data set to surpass the sum of human knowledge. Perhaps those better versed in information technology than I am can tell us if it would be possible to corral an AGI large-language-model so that it would not synthesize such images? | | | |
| Banning Twitter on 18:52 - Jan 9 with 641 views | Gwyn737 |
| Banning Twitter on 18:35 - Jan 9 by AnotherJohn |
I'm not that keen on X, but do post occasionally. As far as my feed goes, the generality of posts are not as anti-woke as they might be, with a plethora of "rejoining the EU", pro-Starmer, and pro-SNP posts, but I would not support banning the platform.
What strikes me is that censorship of fake body images may become more difficult as AI evolves into AGI. The difference is that artificial general intelligence is not optimised on a specific domain, but is trained on a full range of expert knowledge, and will be capable via machine learning to move beyond the training data set to surpass the sum of human knowledge. Perhaps those better versed in information technology than I am can tell us if it would be possible to corral an AGI large-language-model so that it would not synthesize such images? |
I don’t believe in banning it either but as with much tech, I worry about the lack of accountability.
As for AGI I’m no expert but it’s only going to get more powerful. I do question whether overall AI overall will be a good thing. | | | |
| Banning Twitter on 19:20 - Jan 9 with 614 views | max936 |
| Banning Twitter on 18:01 - Jan 9 by Gwyn737 |
I think users that are anti child porn would be happy to see measures taken. |
WTF has that got to do with my post. | |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 19:37 - Jan 9 with 601 views | onehunglow |
| Banning Twitter on 18:52 - Jan 9 by Gwyn737 |
I don’t believe in banning it either but as with much tech, I worry about the lack of accountability.
As for AGI I’m no expert but it’s only going to get more powerful. I do question whether overall AI overall will be a good thing. |
The year 2525 is here already | |
| |
| Banning Twitter on 20:02 - Jan 9 with 592 views | Gwyn737 |
| Banning Twitter on 19:20 - Jan 9 by max936 |
WTF has that got to do with my post. |
You don’t use it so a comment on those who do. | | | |
| Banning Twitter on 20:11 - Jan 9 with 576 views | onehunglow |
| Banning Twitter on 18:01 - Jan 9 by Gwyn737 |
I think users that are anti child porn would be happy to see measures taken. |
Starmer is a barrister
Ergo , he would defend child abusers
It’s his job to
They all need defending
Morality nothing to do with them | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
