Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? 19:09 - Jun 7 with 17667 views | Bobby_Fischer | That boy was getting paid? Or was it just Jim White? | |
| | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:40 - Jun 7 with 1913 views | Phil_S |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:37 - Jun 7 by Bobby_Fischer | Yes or No? |
Are you terminally stupid or can you be cured? | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:46 - Jun 7 with 1878 views | Bobby_Fischer | No im a ?*nt, , you did answer me though, . | |
| |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:51 - Jun 7 with 1844 views | Jonathans_coat |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:46 - Jun 7 by Bobby_Fischer | No im a ?*nt, , you did answer me though, . |
Question for u Bobby. Everybody with half a brain has figured this one out already, so to save everybody the tedium of continuing this thread, what is the point of your question? What are you getting at? I’ll make it really simple. What if:- A. Yes - he was aware B. No - he was not aware | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:51 - Jun 7 with 1841 views | Bobby_Fischer | Soz Gaz I know hes your mate. | |
| |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:55 - Jun 7 with 1825 views | Garyjack |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:51 - Jun 7 by Bobby_Fischer | Soz Gaz I know hes your mate. |
So you're revealing personal details now? | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:58 - Jun 7 with 1811 views | Bobby_Fischer | Haha | |
| |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:58 - Jun 7 with 1813 views | Flashberryjack |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:10 - Jun 7 by Garyjack | Jesus Christ! He didn't take anything on the sly, it was a paid role that was compulsory for every Premier league club to have a full time Supporters liason officer. Nothing to see here. Please don't compare it to Jenkins and the rest of the sell outs as you are making yourself look more stupid with every word you type these days, Which is a shame, as from memory, you started off quite well. |
Are all supporters liaison officers on £40,000 ? | |
| |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:00 - Jun 7 with 1803 views | Bobby_Fischer | Phil are you releasing ppls names?? | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:03 - Jun 7 with 1791 views | Garyjack |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:58 - Jun 7 by Flashberryjack | Are all supporters liaison officers on £40,000 ? |
Who knows Flash. But either way, it's hardly an outrageous sum of money is it? | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:03 - Jun 7 with 1786 views | Bobby_Fischer | I think this thread speaks for itself | |
| |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:06 - Jun 7 with 1775 views | Garyjack |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:03 - Jun 7 by Bobby_Fischer | I think this thread speaks for itself |
I agree, the wind up is over Bob. You're done. | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:11 - Jun 7 with 1755 views | Jonathans_coat |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:58 - Jun 7 by Flashberryjack | Are all supporters liaison officers on £40,000 ? |
Wales Online 28/10/16 “They also revealed the details of payments made to Cooze in previous years by Swansea City FC. Cooze received £5,934 in 2010, £7,219 in 2011, £12, 633 in 2012, £14,438 in 2013, £18,452 in 2014 and £20,028 in 2015.” It wasn’t exactly 40k a year was it? | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:13 - Jun 7 with 1740 views | swancity |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:03 - Jun 7 by Garyjack | Who knows Flash. But either way, it's hardly an outrageous sum of money is it? |
It's not so much the sum of money. Although it's not insignificant. It's the clear conflict of interest. It was wrong. It's one of many mistakes made by the Club and Trust over the years. It's a catalogue of fooking disasters and nightmares. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:16 - Jun 7 with 1722 views | Phil_S |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:00 - Jun 7 by Bobby_Fischer | Phil are you releasing ppls names?? |
No Robert I'm not. Because you dont give them when you register you daft tvvat So how can I release what you havent told me. | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:22 - Jun 7 with 1685 views | Garyjack |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:13 - Jun 7 by swancity | It's not so much the sum of money. Although it's not insignificant. It's the clear conflict of interest. It was wrong. It's one of many mistakes made by the Club and Trust over the years. It's a catalogue of fooking disasters and nightmares. |
Oh i agree, albeit a very small one considering the scale of what's happened i'm sure you'll agree. | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:23 - Jun 7 with 1676 views | jedijack | This thread reminds me of an episode of Derek I watched a couple of years ago. | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:28 - Jun 7 with 1655 views | swancity |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:22 - Jun 7 by Garyjack | Oh i agree, albeit a very small one considering the scale of what's happened i'm sure you'll agree. |
Please stop referring to the amount. That's immaterial and shows you don't understand the seriousness of the situation. It was a paid role, he was a paid employee. It was wrong. It's caused untold and irreparable damage and those involved knew it was wrong. And yet did nothing, not even the Trust people who knew. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:43 - Jun 7 with 1597 views | Garyjack |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:28 - Jun 7 by swancity | Please stop referring to the amount. That's immaterial and shows you don't understand the seriousness of the situation. It was a paid role, he was a paid employee. It was wrong. It's caused untold and irreparable damage and those involved knew it was wrong. And yet did nothing, not even the Trust people who knew. |
I wasn't referring to the amount in my last post, so stop being silly and pedantic. He was a paid employee, it certainly was NOT wrong, but mistakes were made. However, this happened a few years ago, and has been done to death over and over again. It's no longer an issue apart from those who have issues, of which i'm sure you are not one are you? | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:55 - Jun 7 with 1560 views | swancity |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:43 - Jun 7 by Garyjack | I wasn't referring to the amount in my last post, so stop being silly and pedantic. He was a paid employee, it certainly was NOT wrong, but mistakes were made. However, this happened a few years ago, and has been done to death over and over again. It's no longer an issue apart from those who have issues, of which i'm sure you are not one are you? |
' Apart from those that have issues ' Not sure what you mean. I don't know any of those involved personally if that's what you mean. So have no axe to grind. But like many others, I do have an issue with the appalling way that things have unfolded. This is one of many errors that have been made. Why do you think that this was not wrong? Even those involved would surely now accept it was wrong. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:55 - Jun 7 with 1560 views | Jack11 | 2 types of people in the world - people who deal in principles and people who deal in the detail | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:00 - Jun 7 with 1545 views | Jonathans_coat |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:43 - Jun 7 by Garyjack | I wasn't referring to the amount in my last post, so stop being silly and pedantic. He was a paid employee, it certainly was NOT wrong, but mistakes were made. However, this happened a few years ago, and has been done to death over and over again. It's no longer an issue apart from those who have issues, of which i'm sure you are not one are you? |
It was a huge own goal no doubt. It was an error by the trust that allowed accusations of conflicts of interest to be alleged at a time that a united fanbase and trust was crucial. It put the trust on the back foot when they needed to be on the offensive. Phil, Jim, Mr Cooze (and whoever else you want to mention) have admitted errors were made and in many cases stepped down. But to compare or equate it to the deliberate, greedy and underhand methods of the sellouts is just nonsense. [Post edited 7 Jun 2018 23:02]
| | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:04 - Jun 7 with 1533 views | swancity |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:00 - Jun 7 by Jonathans_coat | It was a huge own goal no doubt. It was an error by the trust that allowed accusations of conflicts of interest to be alleged at a time that a united fanbase and trust was crucial. It put the trust on the back foot when they needed to be on the offensive. Phil, Jim, Mr Cooze (and whoever else you want to mention) have admitted errors were made and in many cases stepped down. But to compare or equate it to the deliberate, greedy and underhand methods of the sellouts is just nonsense. [Post edited 7 Jun 2018 23:02]
|
Re last paragraph . No one is. There is no comparison. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:06 - Jun 7 with 1526 views | Jonathans_coat |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:04 - Jun 7 by swancity | Re last paragraph . No one is. There is no comparison. |
Please see:- Bobby_Fischer, 20:58 (page 1) | | | |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:14 - Jun 7 with 1510 views | swancity |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:06 - Jun 7 by Jonathans_coat | Please see:- Bobby_Fischer, 20:58 (page 1) |
Ah right. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 00:10 - Jun 8 with 1431 views | dobjack2 |
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:00 - Jun 7 by Jonathans_coat | It was a huge own goal no doubt. It was an error by the trust that allowed accusations of conflicts of interest to be alleged at a time that a united fanbase and trust was crucial. It put the trust on the back foot when they needed to be on the offensive. Phil, Jim, Mr Cooze (and whoever else you want to mention) have admitted errors were made and in many cases stepped down. But to compare or equate it to the deliberate, greedy and underhand methods of the sellouts is just nonsense. [Post edited 7 Jun 2018 23:02]
|
Its not nonsense it’s deliberate deflection. Jenkins’ salary on top of the money he has made comes up and immediately we have a poster styling himself on a chess world champion trying to deflect attention away to something else. Transparent and pathetic. | | | |
| |