Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? 19:09 - Jun 7 with 17667 viewsBobby_Fischer

That boy was getting paid? Or was it just Jim White?

Poll: Who should take over from Jenkins?

-2
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:40 - Jun 7 with 1913 viewsPhil_S

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:37 - Jun 7 by Bobby_Fischer

Yes or No?


Are you terminally stupid or can you be cured?
1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:46 - Jun 7 with 1878 viewsBobby_Fischer

No im a ?*nt, , you did answer me though, .

Poll: Who should take over from Jenkins?

-1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:51 - Jun 7 with 1844 viewsJonathans_coat

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:46 - Jun 7 by Bobby_Fischer

No im a ?*nt, , you did answer me though, .


Question for u Bobby. Everybody with half a brain has figured this one out already, so to save everybody the tedium of continuing this thread, what is the point of your question? What are you getting at?

I’ll make it really simple. What if:-

A. Yes - he was aware

B. No - he was not aware
1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:51 - Jun 7 with 1841 viewsBobby_Fischer

Soz Gaz I know hes your mate.

Poll: Who should take over from Jenkins?

-1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:55 - Jun 7 with 1825 viewsGaryjack

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:51 - Jun 7 by Bobby_Fischer

Soz Gaz I know hes your mate.


So you're revealing personal details now?
0
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:58 - Jun 7 with 1811 viewsBobby_Fischer

Haha

Poll: Who should take over from Jenkins?

-1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:58 - Jun 7 with 1813 viewsFlashberryjack

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:10 - Jun 7 by Garyjack

Jesus Christ! He didn't take anything on the sly, it was a paid role that was compulsory for every Premier league club to have a full time Supporters liason officer. Nothing to see here. Please don't compare it to Jenkins and the rest of the sell outs as you are making yourself look more stupid with every word you type these days, Which is a shame, as from memory, you started off quite well.


Are all supporters liaison officers on £40,000 ?

Hello
Poll: Should the Senedd be Abolished

0
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:00 - Jun 7 with 1803 viewsBobby_Fischer

Phil are you releasing ppls names??

Poll: Who should take over from Jenkins?

-1
Login to get fewer ads

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:03 - Jun 7 with 1791 viewsGaryjack

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:58 - Jun 7 by Flashberryjack

Are all supporters liaison officers on £40,000 ?


Who knows Flash. But either way, it's hardly an outrageous sum of money is it?
0
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:03 - Jun 7 with 1786 viewsBobby_Fischer

I think this thread speaks for itself

Poll: Who should take over from Jenkins?

-1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:06 - Jun 7 with 1775 viewsGaryjack

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:03 - Jun 7 by Bobby_Fischer

I think this thread speaks for itself


I agree, the wind up is over Bob. You're done.
1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:11 - Jun 7 with 1755 viewsJonathans_coat

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 21:58 - Jun 7 by Flashberryjack

Are all supporters liaison officers on £40,000 ?


Wales Online 28/10/16

“They also revealed the details of payments made to Cooze in previous years by Swansea City FC. Cooze received £5,934 in 2010, £7,219 in 2011, £12, 633 in 2012, £14,438 in 2013, £18,452 in 2014 and £20,028 in 2015.”

It wasn’t exactly 40k a year was it?
1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:13 - Jun 7 with 1740 viewsswancity

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:03 - Jun 7 by Garyjack

Who knows Flash. But either way, it's hardly an outrageous sum of money is it?


It's not so much the sum of money. Although it's not insignificant. It's the clear conflict of interest. It was wrong. It's one of many mistakes made by the Club and Trust over the years. It's a catalogue of fooking disasters and nightmares.

Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day

-1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:16 - Jun 7 with 1722 viewsPhil_S

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:00 - Jun 7 by Bobby_Fischer

Phil are you releasing ppls names??


No Robert I'm not.

Because you dont give them when you register you daft tvvat

So how can I release what you havent told me.
3
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:22 - Jun 7 with 1685 viewsGaryjack

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:13 - Jun 7 by swancity

It's not so much the sum of money. Although it's not insignificant. It's the clear conflict of interest. It was wrong. It's one of many mistakes made by the Club and Trust over the years. It's a catalogue of fooking disasters and nightmares.


Oh i agree, albeit a very small one considering the scale of what's happened i'm sure you'll agree.
0
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:23 - Jun 7 with 1676 viewsjedijack

This thread reminds me of an episode of Derek I watched a couple of years ago.
0
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:28 - Jun 7 with 1655 viewsswancity

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:22 - Jun 7 by Garyjack

Oh i agree, albeit a very small one considering the scale of what's happened i'm sure you'll agree.


Please stop referring to the amount. That's immaterial and shows you don't understand the seriousness of the situation. It was a paid role, he was a paid employee. It was wrong. It's caused untold and irreparable damage and those involved knew it was wrong. And yet did nothing, not even the Trust people who knew.

Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day

-1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:43 - Jun 7 with 1597 viewsGaryjack

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:28 - Jun 7 by swancity

Please stop referring to the amount. That's immaterial and shows you don't understand the seriousness of the situation. It was a paid role, he was a paid employee. It was wrong. It's caused untold and irreparable damage and those involved knew it was wrong. And yet did nothing, not even the Trust people who knew.


I wasn't referring to the amount in my last post, so stop being silly and pedantic. He was a paid employee, it certainly was NOT wrong, but mistakes were made. However, this happened a few years ago, and has been done to death over and over again. It's no longer an issue apart from those who have issues, of which i'm sure you are not one are you?
2
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:55 - Jun 7 with 1560 viewsswancity

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:43 - Jun 7 by Garyjack

I wasn't referring to the amount in my last post, so stop being silly and pedantic. He was a paid employee, it certainly was NOT wrong, but mistakes were made. However, this happened a few years ago, and has been done to death over and over again. It's no longer an issue apart from those who have issues, of which i'm sure you are not one are you?


' Apart from those that have issues '

Not sure what you mean. I don't know any of those involved personally if that's what you mean. So have no axe to grind. But like many others, I do have an issue with the appalling way that things have unfolded. This is one of many errors that have been made.

Why do you think that this was not wrong? Even those involved would surely now accept it was wrong.

Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day

-1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:55 - Jun 7 with 1560 viewsJack11

2 types of people in the world - people who deal in principles and people who deal in the detail
0
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:00 - Jun 7 with 1545 viewsJonathans_coat

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 22:43 - Jun 7 by Garyjack

I wasn't referring to the amount in my last post, so stop being silly and pedantic. He was a paid employee, it certainly was NOT wrong, but mistakes were made. However, this happened a few years ago, and has been done to death over and over again. It's no longer an issue apart from those who have issues, of which i'm sure you are not one are you?


It was a huge own goal no doubt. It was an error by the trust that allowed accusations of conflicts of interest to be alleged at a time that a united fanbase and trust was crucial. It put the trust on the back foot when they needed to be on the offensive. Phil, Jim, Mr Cooze (and whoever else you want to mention) have admitted errors were made and in many cases stepped down.

But to compare or equate it to the deliberate, greedy and underhand methods of the sellouts is just nonsense.
[Post edited 7 Jun 2018 23:02]
0
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:04 - Jun 7 with 1533 viewsswancity

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:00 - Jun 7 by Jonathans_coat

It was a huge own goal no doubt. It was an error by the trust that allowed accusations of conflicts of interest to be alleged at a time that a united fanbase and trust was crucial. It put the trust on the back foot when they needed to be on the offensive. Phil, Jim, Mr Cooze (and whoever else you want to mention) have admitted errors were made and in many cases stepped down.

But to compare or equate it to the deliberate, greedy and underhand methods of the sellouts is just nonsense.
[Post edited 7 Jun 2018 23:02]


Re last paragraph . No one is. There is no comparison.

Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day

-1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:06 - Jun 7 with 1526 viewsJonathans_coat

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:04 - Jun 7 by swancity

Re last paragraph . No one is. There is no comparison.


Please see:-

Bobby_Fischer, 20:58 (page 1)
1
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:14 - Jun 7 with 1510 viewsswancity

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:06 - Jun 7 by Jonathans_coat

Please see:-

Bobby_Fischer, 20:58 (page 1)


Ah right.

Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day

0
Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 00:10 - Jun 8 with 1431 viewsdobjack2

Phil S? Did you know about the £40,000? on 23:00 - Jun 7 by Jonathans_coat

It was a huge own goal no doubt. It was an error by the trust that allowed accusations of conflicts of interest to be alleged at a time that a united fanbase and trust was crucial. It put the trust on the back foot when they needed to be on the offensive. Phil, Jim, Mr Cooze (and whoever else you want to mention) have admitted errors were made and in many cases stepped down.

But to compare or equate it to the deliberate, greedy and underhand methods of the sellouts is just nonsense.
[Post edited 7 Jun 2018 23:02]


Its not nonsense it’s deliberate deflection.

Jenkins’ salary on top of the money he has made comes up and immediately we have a poster styling himself on a chess world champion trying to deflect attention away to something else.

Transparent and pathetic.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024