By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Steven Jones is/was a physicist specialising in cold fusion, this does not make him a "reputable scientist" in the fields of structural or civil engineering.
Just because someone is a professor it doesn't make them an expert in every single subject known to man and in the case of Steven Jones' rag tag bunch of 'experts' most of the professors aren't even scientists let alone engineers. I wouldn't want a professor of philosophy to build me a bridge.
After publishing his first 9/11 paper Steven Jones was put on paid leave and investigated by his university because it was not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses had been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review.
" I wouldn't want a professor of philosophy to build me a bridge. "
He could come in handy regarding the noise or lack of it when it collapsed with no one close enough to hear though.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 11:53 - Mar 28 with 1877 views
This thread just shows me there are an alarming number of people without the mental faculties to be able to cope with all the information available these days. Combined with a craving to believe in something, we get this shower of sh*t.
These conspiracy theory amoeba’s still fail to explain how? In the time-period leading up to the disaster? Suspicion was never raised by WTC employees/security staff by the arrival of hundreds of unfamiliar workmen required to strategically lay out from beam to beam, from truss to truss, from floor to floor the Thermite required to bring it down from top to bottom?
The steelwork was enclosed by tons upon tons of layers of building material and even if the bare steelwork had not been exposed the Thermite would still then have to be placed in mounds on the floor in full view? A large scale measuring-up operation to locate and mark exact Thermite placement points would also be required. And despite a previous terrorist attack? Not one of the WTC thousands/security staff (vigilant by nature?) noticed hundred upon hundreds of inexplicable equally spaced Thermite powder mounds on the carpet or even saw it being laid out?
Zero common sense and reality = conspiracy theorist = embarrassment to themselves!
[Post edited 28 Mar 2016 12:30]
Argus!
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 13:05 - Mar 28 with 1778 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 12:10 - Mar 28 by Wingstandwood
These conspiracy theory amoeba’s still fail to explain how? In the time-period leading up to the disaster? Suspicion was never raised by WTC employees/security staff by the arrival of hundreds of unfamiliar workmen required to strategically lay out from beam to beam, from truss to truss, from floor to floor the Thermite required to bring it down from top to bottom?
The steelwork was enclosed by tons upon tons of layers of building material and even if the bare steelwork had not been exposed the Thermite would still then have to be placed in mounds on the floor in full view? A large scale measuring-up operation to locate and mark exact Thermite placement points would also be required. And despite a previous terrorist attack? Not one of the WTC thousands/security staff (vigilant by nature?) noticed hundred upon hundreds of inexplicable equally spaced Thermite powder mounds on the carpet or even saw it being laid out?
Zero common sense and reality = conspiracy theorist = embarrassment to themselves!
[Post edited 28 Mar 2016 12:30]
Don't waste your time mate.....it seems common sense isn't that common for some on here.
9/11 unanswered questions on 12:10 - Mar 28 by Wingstandwood
These conspiracy theory amoeba’s still fail to explain how? In the time-period leading up to the disaster? Suspicion was never raised by WTC employees/security staff by the arrival of hundreds of unfamiliar workmen required to strategically lay out from beam to beam, from truss to truss, from floor to floor the Thermite required to bring it down from top to bottom?
The steelwork was enclosed by tons upon tons of layers of building material and even if the bare steelwork had not been exposed the Thermite would still then have to be placed in mounds on the floor in full view? A large scale measuring-up operation to locate and mark exact Thermite placement points would also be required. And despite a previous terrorist attack? Not one of the WTC thousands/security staff (vigilant by nature?) noticed hundred upon hundreds of inexplicable equally spaced Thermite powder mounds on the carpet or even saw it being laid out?
Zero common sense and reality = conspiracy theorist = embarrassment to themselves!
[Post edited 28 Mar 2016 12:30]
If you don't believe thermite or any similar substance were actually present, then you've got a MASSIVE problem, because as I have emphatically stated many times, carbon fires do not reach the temperatures required, and even NIST admits that the steel beams reached only temperatures of 250 degrees Celsius.
You have an even bigger problem explaining how temperatures of approximately 750 degrees Celsius was measured by USGS 6 days after 911 even when it had rained heavily shortly after 911, and that the fires continued to burn for 3 months. Are you willing to suggest that this was the jet fuel?
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:18 - Mar 28 with 1681 views
It is strange how the explosion of the plane was hot enough to melt steel and bring down two massive buildings, but wasn't hot enough to burn the passport of the highjackers which just fluttered down to the ground intact for a police officer to find conveniently a few days later. It's probably just one of those unexplainable unanswerable questions that cliff Richard will take to the grave with him.
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
For those of you who care to see how BBC goes about interviewing a PhD chemist with over forty years of professional experience and numerous published articles, you should watch this interview where BBC's Mike Rudin makes a fool of himself:
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:34 - Mar 28 with 1701 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:17 - Mar 28 by jackedup
If you don't believe thermite or any similar substance were actually present, then you've got a MASSIVE problem, because as I have emphatically stated many times, carbon fires do not reach the temperatures required, and even NIST admits that the steel beams reached only temperatures of 250 degrees Celsius.
You have an even bigger problem explaining how temperatures of approximately 750 degrees Celsius was measured by USGS 6 days after 911 even when it had rained heavily shortly after 911, and that the fires continued to burn for 3 months. Are you willing to suggest that this was the jet fuel?
The bit that no 9:11 conspiracy theorist seems to ever answer is why.
Why on earth would the U.S. Government do it?
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:35 - Mar 28 with 1698 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:20 - Mar 28 by jackedup
For those of you who care to see how BBC goes about interviewing a PhD chemist with over forty years of professional experience and numerous published articles, you should watch this interview where BBC's Mike Rudin makes a fool of himself:
The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:34 - Mar 28 by londonlisa2001
The bit that no 9:11 conspiracy theorist seems to ever answer is why.
Why on earth would the U.S. Government do it?
Actually, I've shown you several reasons stated by Brzezinski of the Trilateral Commission, The Project for a New American Century, and by then VP of Unocal John Maresca -- but it seems you've ignored them.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:42 - Mar 28 with 1680 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:41 - Mar 28 by jackedup
Actually, I've shown you several reasons stated by Brzezinski of the Trilateral Commission, The Project for a New American Century, and by then VP of Unocal John Maresca -- but it seems you've ignored them.
I repeat, if no plane hit the Pentagon , what happened to American Airline flight 77 and the 64 people on board?
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:49 - Mar 28 with 1644 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:41 - Mar 28 by jackedup
Actually, I've shown you several reasons stated by Brzezinski of the Trilateral Commission, The Project for a New American Century, and by then VP of Unocal John Maresca -- but it seems you've ignored them.
No you haven't. You've given reasons why it may suit certain groups to stage a 'terrorist incident' in th US but not one that says why they would choose to do something that was so ridiculously complex, fraught with problems, requiring of so much luck, cost so much money, rather than set 10 suicide bombers loose on the major cities of the U.S. in a coordinated attack.
Shove a bomber in Times Square, another in Washington, etc etc and the same effect would have been achieved with a million times less hassle, organisation, money.
1
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:50 - Mar 28 with 1635 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:44 - Mar 28 by exiledclaseboy
There is nothing, no theory so outlandish, no conspiracy so unlikely that it can't be "proven" by producing an obscure video from YouTube.
And there is no government "conspiracy theory" so outlandish that it can't be "proven" through the power of suggestion alone. When the public is told repeatedly that an 11 second collapse of construction grade framed high rises can occur due to carbon fires, then all the sheep forget everything they learned about Galileo and Newton, if they ever learned it in the first place.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:54 - Mar 28 with 1623 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:47 - Mar 28 by Witneyjack
I repeat, if no plane hit the Pentagon , what happened to American Airline flight 77 and the 64 people on board?
I refuse to speculate, because there would be little or no evidence for such speculations.
Maybe if you bothered to read Operation Northwoods, then you might be able to form some of your own opinions. But I think you don't want to bother with that.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:57 - Mar 28 with 1619 views
9/11 unanswered questions on 13:20 - Mar 28 by CountyJim
All Jews where told not to go to work that day
Pass the Tinfoil please
In many ways this falsehood is amonst the most awful of all of them.
The FACT that between 10% and 15% of all fatalities that day were Jewish (which equates to the number expected given the demographics of New York), all of whom are just ignored in a desperate fight to be anti Semitic.
0
9/11 unanswered questions on 15:06 - Mar 28 with 1595 views
I don't know whether it was an 'inside job' or if any of the theories that I have seen put forward (some of them incredibly daft - the planes were holograms for instance) are true...but there are a lot of 'iffy' things that happened that day, and many 'firsts'.
WTC 7 is one odd thing. The other is why they confiscated hundreds of CCTV tapes that may have shown the Pentagon during the attack. The 5 frames that they released show nothing but an explosion.
I have no proof that this means there is something dodgy going on, but why not just release a tape and shut all of the conspiracy theorists up? I don't get it.
9/11 unanswered questions on 14:49 - Mar 28 by londonlisa2001
No you haven't. You've given reasons why it may suit certain groups to stage a 'terrorist incident' in th US but not one that says why they would choose to do something that was so ridiculously complex, fraught with problems, requiring of so much luck, cost so much money, rather than set 10 suicide bombers loose on the major cities of the U.S. in a coordinated attack.
Shove a bomber in Times Square, another in Washington, etc etc and the same effect would have been achieved with a million times less hassle, organisation, money.
And with that, I think you've answered the question.
9/11 conspiracy theorists aren't crazy. Just dense.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
