| Club statement on 17:03 - Jun 1 with 3396 views | arfurdent |
club rolling on its back waiting for a good kicking from the FA |  |
| So Long and Thanks for all the Fish |
|  |
| Club statement on 17:04 - Jun 1 with 3391 views | PatfromPoole |
Pistols at dawn with the EFL then. |  |
| |
| Club statement on 17:04 - Jun 1 with 3389 views | Southamptonfan |
It doesn't really say much at all does it?
Nothing about Tonda
Nothing about any legal appeals
Can anybody else read between the lines? |  |
| |
| Club statement on 17:08 - Jun 1 with 3363 views | PatfromPoole |
| Club statement on 17:04 - Jun 1 by Southamptonfan |
It doesn't really say much at all does it?
Nothing about Tonda
Nothing about any legal appeals
Can anybody else read between the lines? |
It looks to me that we are playing the role of the "wronged party", hoping that the FA go soft on us. | |
| |
| Club statement on 17:40 - Jun 1 with 3232 views | MattFinish |
If they’re not going to take this further all they’ve done is p!ss off the EFL
I don’t get it |  | | |
| Club statement on 17:47 - Jun 1 with 3213 views | TripleNiemi |
Christ, so poor it could have been written by a gimp from the Daily Echo or Masters graduate from Solent Uni..... |  |
| |
| Club statement on 18:09 - Jun 1 with 3078 views | DorsetIan |
| Club statement on 17:40 - Jun 1 by MattFinish |
If they’re not going to take this further all they’ve done is p!ss off the EFL
I don’t get it |
The fact that the Club itself is now referring to the make up of the original Tribunal suggests to me definitely that the two panel members did not disclose their connections to Boro at the Truibunal.
And that was p!ss poor and it was also p1ss poor that those individuals were placed on the panel in the first place. It was a serious error on the part of the EFL, Sports Resolution and, particularly, David Winnie and it seriously taints the decisions even if Saints are not minded to take it any further.
It does, of course, now beg the question, why the f*ckety f*ck did Saints' lawyers not pick this up at the time, when it took some of us on here about 5 minutes to check Winnie's Wikipedia page.
And maybe this statement is a shot across the bows of the FA, perhaps deterring them from kicking us too hard when we've already been the recipients of some dodgy justice. |  |
| |
| Club statement on 19:37 - Jun 1 with 2832 views | saint22 |
Well that’s a lot of nothing isn’t it
Essentially us whinging we have been hard done by
When the fook are the club actually gonna take charge of this and fire those responsible and start again
Pathetic leadership | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Club statement on 19:42 - Jun 1 with 2815 views | Bazza |
| Club statement on 18:09 - Jun 1 by DorsetIan |
The fact that the Club itself is now referring to the make up of the original Tribunal suggests to me definitely that the two panel members did not disclose their connections to Boro at the Truibunal.
And that was p!ss poor and it was also p1ss poor that those individuals were placed on the panel in the first place. It was a serious error on the part of the EFL, Sports Resolution and, particularly, David Winnie and it seriously taints the decisions even if Saints are not minded to take it any further.
It does, of course, now beg the question, why the f*ckety f*ck did Saints' lawyers not pick this up at the time, when it took some of us on here about 5 minutes to check Winnie's Wikipedia page.
And maybe this statement is a shot across the bows of the FA, perhaps deterring them from kicking us too hard when we've already been the recipients of some dodgy justice. |
I agree with these comments, certainly I don’t think we should be sharpening the guillotine as some think. | | | |
| Club statement on 19:52 - Jun 1 with 2785 views | saintmark1976 |
| Club statement on 18:09 - Jun 1 by DorsetIan |
The fact that the Club itself is now referring to the make up of the original Tribunal suggests to me definitely that the two panel members did not disclose their connections to Boro at the Truibunal.
And that was p!ss poor and it was also p1ss poor that those individuals were placed on the panel in the first place. It was a serious error on the part of the EFL, Sports Resolution and, particularly, David Winnie and it seriously taints the decisions even if Saints are not minded to take it any further.
It does, of course, now beg the question, why the f*ckety f*ck did Saints' lawyers not pick this up at the time, when it took some of us on here about 5 minutes to check Winnie's Wikipedia page.
And maybe this statement is a shot across the bows of the FA, perhaps deterring them from kicking us too hard when we've already been the recipients of some dodgy justice. |
Why wasn’t it picked up.
Because in typical Sports Republic fashion we sent a water pistol to a gun fight. | |
| |
| Club statement on 20:00 - Jun 1 with 2740 views | washington_saint |
| Club statement on 17:04 - Jun 1 by Southamptonfan |
It doesn't really say much at all does it?
Nothing about Tonda
Nothing about any legal appeals
Can anybody else read between the lines? |
That is a typical legal statement. Reading between the lines I would say it appears Saints are getting ready to litigate bases on advice they have been given.
This is why, imo, they are being quiet unlike the efl leaks, etc.
If you look at the oped from a retired very senior judge you'll see he thinks ks we have a very strong legal case.
Adam Blackmore is an idiot with his high horse comments. He seriously thinks this incident is more damning for Saints than the Higgins situation?
Utter buffoon | | | |
| Club statement on 22:14 - Jun 1 with 2452 views | UTS1885 |
Woeful statement full of more arrogance and this bias stuff is a load of bobbins. |  | | |
| Club statement on 01:15 - Jun 2 with 2255 views | sledger |
| Club statement on 18:09 - Jun 1 by DorsetIan |
The fact that the Club itself is now referring to the make up of the original Tribunal suggests to me definitely that the two panel members did not disclose their connections to Boro at the Truibunal.
And that was p!ss poor and it was also p1ss poor that those individuals were placed on the panel in the first place. It was a serious error on the part of the EFL, Sports Resolution and, particularly, David Winnie and it seriously taints the decisions even if Saints are not minded to take it any further.
It does, of course, now beg the question, why the f*ckety f*ck did Saints' lawyers not pick this up at the time, when it took some of us on here about 5 minutes to check Winnie's Wikipedia page.
And maybe this statement is a shot across the bows of the FA, perhaps deterring them from kicking us too hard when we've already been the recipients of some dodgy justice. |
you're dead right I think its a shot across the bows for the fa,hit us stupidly hard and the club will make a legal appeal which could get messy for the fa and the efl | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.