 | Your
Report | Southampton v Wolverhampton Wanderers Your Report added by jameslastfan at 12:23:22
Horrible game, two poor teams. Saints gave ball away too often, no periods of real control other than the odd few minutes.
Midfield gave up - not fit not interested, Dibling poor, looks bored - like Smallbone wanders around and doesn’t commit. Wear shin pads for goodness sake!. Sugawara too many mistakes. ABK and THB could be basis of defence but need to look like they know each other occasionally - look like strangers meeting up once a week for a kick about.
Fernandes best player - substitution and then throwing him under the bus with so much more ineptitude on the pitch is my reason for now saying the boss has to go.
Stephen’s sub was his way of re introducing him to the game when no-one really cared at that stage. He is now back and watch out next game for a start.
So many poor decisions by players and manager - my worry is now throwing the Fernandes lad under the bus just knocks his confidence. Horrible to see. |
| Your
Report | Southampton v Wolverhampton Wanderers Your Report added by jameslastfan at 12:23:20
Horrible game, two poor teams. Saints gave ball away too often, no periods of real control other than the odd few minutes.
Midfield gave up - not fit not interested, Dibling poor, looks bored - like Smallbone wanders around and doesn’t commit. Wear shin pads for goodness sake!. Sugawara too many mistakes. ABK and THB could be basis of defence but need to look like they know each other occasionally - look like strangers meeting up once a week for a kick about.
Fernandes best player - substitution and then throwing him under the bus with so much more ineptitude on the pitch is my reason for now saying the boss has to go.
Stephen’s sub was his way of re introducing him to the game when no-one really cared at that stage. He is now back and watch out next game for a start.
So many poor decisions by players and manager - my worry is now throwing the Fernandes lad under the bus just knocks his confidence. Horrible to see. |
| Your
Report | Southampton v Wolverhampton Wanderers Your Report added by Block8 at 21:24:04
they have no idea how to set up a matchday team and it was obvious today. a fair bit of attacking play early on but nobody on the end of it! two right backs, no striker?
FFS can we not set up 4-4-2 with everyone in a position that is natural to them?
We are the worst team in this division and only able to emphasise this we each game we play!! |
| Your
Report | Southampton v Wolverhampton Wanderers Your Report added by Boris1977 at 18:54:27
Sports Republic have made this club a laughing stock, their hedging of bets on spending millions on chance buys cannot be successful, particularly in the top flight. It may work in the weak leagues of Europe which is sports republic natural market but they are out of their depth in England. They need to sell up.
As for juric - he must be being paid stupid money to manage saints as I can't think of any other reason why pride hasn'tafe him resign.
The root of this pathetic relegation is on the owners but the last two years have been more depressing than when we went down back in the 2000s - back then we were in serious financial dire straits so couldn't afford decent players however this time the money has been there but had been squandered.
COURs |
| Your
Report | Southampton v Wolverhampton Wanderers Your Report added by SaintPaulVW at 18:40:28
For most of the game we looked good but we just seem to switch off at key moments. 2 soft goals and a clear chance that Sulemana just didn't take.
Aside from Leicester, I struggle to see where we will get enough points to beat Derby's record.
And IJ's random subs generator must have made the bet 365 crowd a fortune today. Chasing a game- bring on a CB!
|
| Your
Report | Southampton v Wolverhampton Wanderers Your Report added by Bowlercow at 18:35:19
The starting 11 was much what I expected and apart from Gronbaek for Sugawara is what I would have chosen Why play a FB as a m/f when you have a natural m/field player on the bench
When they scored where were our centre backs?Were we zonal marking or man to man marking?
And up to the we had dominated the half
To see Frnandez subbed off at half time for tall Paul was unbelievable. But he beat that when he brought on Archer At that stage we had a back 4,2 holding players,two wide players and 2 centre forwards Not an attacking m/f player in sight Just when you thought it couldn't get worse and we were chasing a draw he brings on Jack Stevens Why?
Crowd unrest a nd a chant of you don't know what you're doing should be enough to convince our director of foot ball that Juric should go NOW9 |
| Your
Report | Liverpool v Southampton Your Report added by I_would at 15:15:49
We've been saying for ages Saints can't play five at the back, even before Juric. Every comment after every recent loss fans have been saying go to a back four.
As soon as Juric does it, bingo, we play a lot better, apart from Dibbling who needs to go out on loan asap. We made a couple of mistakes which cost us the game but I think a creditable performance and, certainly, not embarrassing as we have been with our, walk-this-way-please, midfield.
Just goes to show that all the fans know better than Juric so SR get rid asap please. |
| Your
Report | Liverpool v Southampton Your Report added by I_would at 15:15:37
We've been saying for ages Saints can't play five at the back, even before Juric. Every comment after every recent loss fans have been saying go to a back four.
As soon as Juric does it, bingo, we play a lot better, apart from Dibbling who needs to go out on loan asap. We made a couple of mistakes which cost us the game but I think a creditable performance and, certainly, not embarrassing as we have been with our, walk-this-way-please, midfield.
Just goes to show that all the fans know better than Juric so SR get rid asap please. |
| Your
Report | Liverpool v Southampton Your Report added by I_would at 13:53:15
We've been saying for ages Saints can't play five at the back, even before Juric. Every comment after every recent loss fans have been saying go to a back four.
As soon as Juric does it, bingo, we play a lot better, apart from Dibbling who needs to go out on loan asap. We made a couple of mistakes which cost us the game but I think a creditable performance and, certainly, not embarrassing as we have been with our, walk-this-way-please, midfield.
Just goes to show that all the fans know better than Juric so SR get rid asap please. |
| Your
Report | Liverpool v Southampton Your Report added by Block8 at 09:07:47
Under pressure from the start but thought Manning handled Salah well. Lacked any punch up front, without a striker. Sulemana played reasonably well but Tyler couldn't get into the game & was frequently doubled up on. We certainly looked better with a back four! |
 | Your
Report | West Bromwich Albion v Queens Park Rangers Your Report added by MelakaRanger at 06:25:14
But for Colbacks brain fart we would have got a point - at least.
Shameful that in 90 mins of normal play - 45 of which against 10 men - we didn't have a single shot on target. Their goalie didnt need to make a single save until 95 mins. There cannot be a team in this league that is in even the slightest bit worried about playing against us.
Until we have a proper, injury free, striker or two we are going no where but mid-low table. Goals win matches and since Chaz left us for the first time, we have not had anyone who can regularly score goals and keep fit.
Thank God for our 2 month purple patch in December & January.
|
|
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.