By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Ready to play apparently - wouldn't surprise me to see him start in place of Andersen with Saito and Dembele either side
[Post edited 23 Aug 16:03]
I suspect he could start instead of Varane/Colback. Anderson definitely missing out but, hopefully short term. Suspect Smyth may start ahead of Saito.
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one's lifetime." (Mark Twain)
Find me on twitter @derbyhoop and now on Bluesky
0
Transfer rumours 2024 on 16:22 - Aug 23 with 4508 views
WLS is saying Madsen bought for "...an initial fee of £2m" whatever that means.
It's simple really. The fee is calculated by the numerical value of the letters in the animal I am thinking of (using the Tibetan system) divided by the players age, weight (in milligrams) and multiplied by his height (in miles at sea level), then balancing this against the value of his contract in Peruvian Futtock crypto (as of today's date) and subtracting a percentage of the predicted value of his first born child (excluding increases due to inflation and/or appearances on Michael MacIntyre shows). Put the two calculations into the box, sacrifice the official club axolotl (examining the liver for defects, of course). Bring in the ghost of Quentin Bumjoy to adjudicate and, Bob's your uncle (subject to approval).
'What do we want? We don't know! When do we want it? Now!'
7
Transfer rumours 2024 on 17:11 - Aug 23 with 3896 views
It's simple really. The fee is calculated by the numerical value of the letters in the animal I am thinking of (using the Tibetan system) divided by the players age, weight (in milligrams) and multiplied by his height (in miles at sea level), then balancing this against the value of his contract in Peruvian Futtock crypto (as of today's date) and subtracting a percentage of the predicted value of his first born child (excluding increases due to inflation and/or appearances on Michael MacIntyre shows). Put the two calculations into the box, sacrifice the official club axolotl (examining the liver for defects, of course). Bring in the ghost of Quentin Bumjoy to adjudicate and, Bob's your uncle (subject to approval).
Christian, is that you?
4
Transfer rumours 2024 on 17:15 - Aug 23 with 3863 views
Undisclosed fee and unknown length of contract. The mystery continues..........
I have been following the somes lively always respectful debate with great interest over the past few days and here's my tuppence worth. First thing that's stans out for me is the obvious I suppose regardless of which side of the debate you favour and that is the passion and caring that is obvious from all posters
Second thing is I can see merits to both sides of the debate. I fully understand Clive and others frustration at the non disclosure of contract lengths and fees. When such info is obviously accessible else where (agents family members ) it seems petty and self - damaging to keep these kind of facts our of the public domain. It is not like we are going to have one up on Plymouth tomorrow because they don't know how long Varane's contract is for example. However the other side of the argument has validity too. When I started following QPR I had no inside info into what was happening except what unfolded in front of me (usually on BBC 5 Live) on a Saturday afternoon between 3 and 4.45. And to be honest I had no interest either. I had no insight into the managers thoughts pre or post match. Transfers only became apparent when the player appeared in your kit, not speculated on for weeks or months in advance. And I certainly never got to hear if a 20 year old reserves joining a non- league club on loan. So yes I think we are probably too invested in the non- football ( money, transfers back room staff etc) affairs of the club which is a result of Social Media and the invasiveness of SKY On the actual debate itself I believe that while we seem to be spending (some) money we don't have, there is a world of difference in signing Varane rather than Johanson and Cellar rather than Austin While these additions are untried at Championship level and therefore a gamble it is hard to imagine they would crash and burn to the extent that at the very least we would recoup what we have spent which was never going to happen with Austin or Johanson
6
Transfer rumours 2024 on 17:32 - Aug 23 with 3668 views
I have been following the somes lively always respectful debate with great interest over the past few days and here's my tuppence worth. First thing that's stans out for me is the obvious I suppose regardless of which side of the debate you favour and that is the passion and caring that is obvious from all posters
Second thing is I can see merits to both sides of the debate. I fully understand Clive and others frustration at the non disclosure of contract lengths and fees. When such info is obviously accessible else where (agents family members ) it seems petty and self - damaging to keep these kind of facts our of the public domain. It is not like we are going to have one up on Plymouth tomorrow because they don't know how long Varane's contract is for example. However the other side of the argument has validity too. When I started following QPR I had no inside info into what was happening except what unfolded in front of me (usually on BBC 5 Live) on a Saturday afternoon between 3 and 4.45. And to be honest I had no interest either. I had no insight into the managers thoughts pre or post match. Transfers only became apparent when the player appeared in your kit, not speculated on for weeks or months in advance. And I certainly never got to hear if a 20 year old reserves joining a non- league club on loan. So yes I think we are probably too invested in the non- football ( money, transfers back room staff etc) affairs of the club which is a result of Social Media and the invasiveness of SKY On the actual debate itself I believe that while we seem to be spending (some) money we don't have, there is a world of difference in signing Varane rather than Johanson and Cellar rather than Austin While these additions are untried at Championship level and therefore a gamble it is hard to imagine they would crash and burn to the extent that at the very least we would recoup what we have spent which was never going to happen with Austin or Johanson
Teletext 0898121162
You forgot about these marvellous on the spot media platforms. Huh platforms = Willesden junction
It's simple really. The fee is calculated by the numerical value of the letters in the animal I am thinking of (using the Tibetan system) divided by the players age, weight (in milligrams) and multiplied by his height (in miles at sea level), then balancing this against the value of his contract in Peruvian Futtock crypto (as of today's date) and subtracting a percentage of the predicted value of his first born child (excluding increases due to inflation and/or appearances on Michael MacIntyre shows). Put the two calculations into the box, sacrifice the official club axolotl (examining the liver for defects, of course). Bring in the ghost of Quentin Bumjoy to adjudicate and, Bob's your uncle (subject to approval).
I heard it was being done on Visa card
0
Transfer rumours 2024 on 19:33 - Aug 23 with 2946 views
I don't think we are done yet, caught conversation on Twitter yesterday where a couple of Man City fans were discussing Josh Wilson-Esbrand and were suggesting he was coming here. Would imagine might be the back up option for the Liverpool lad could also be subject to Paal going. Was on loan at Cardiff last season.
Transfer rumours 2024 on 14:58 - Aug 23 by kensalriser
If he does sign, I might persistently call him Madson just to piss off all the people that have been pissing me off because they can't get Andersen right.
Hmm, on second thoughts, flawed strategy. They probably won't notice.
Google led me to this, which apart from telling me more about machine guns than I've ever wanted to know, suggests to me the correct pronunciation is Mason:
Also, if he's like the gun: - expensive but reliable - a Danish product that won't crumble when your neighbours come to visit - handy for dealing with giant reptile monsters.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
