| Leeds 13:57 - Mar 9 with 7472 views | kernow |
Are they going to choke again? |  | | |  |
| Leeds on 13:42 - Mar 12 with 1295 views | PatfromPoole |
| Leeds on 13:37 - Mar 12 by TimSaint |
Previously you failed to give the year. I wonder why ?
Perhaps that is because Southampton FC have never played in Division 4.
Saints were in Division 3 (South) for the seasons 1953-54, 1954-55, 1955-56, 1956-57, 1957-58 inclusive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Southampton_F.C._seasons
Even you are capable of looking this up and confirming it for yourself.
I originally went to great lengths to explain how the Division 3 North and South leagues worked and how they ran in parallel with each other, but clearly you didn't have the mental capacity to take the facts on board at the time and still don't today.
# Must try harder
# Do more research before making a dick of yourself |
He is busy writing lines, hopefully.
You will get a suitably erudite response in due course, no doubt. |  |
| |
| Leeds on 17:32 - Mar 12 with 1177 views | 130yrs_and_one_Cup |
| Leeds on 13:37 - Mar 12 by TimSaint |
Previously you failed to give the year. I wonder why ?
Perhaps that is because Southampton FC have never played in Division 4.
Saints were in Division 3 (South) for the seasons 1953-54, 1954-55, 1955-56, 1956-57, 1957-58 inclusive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Southampton_F.C._seasons
Even you are capable of looking this up and confirming it for yourself.
I originally went to great lengths to explain how the Division 3 North and South leagues worked and how they ran in parallel with each other, but clearly you didn't have the mental capacity to take the facts on board at the time and still don't today.
# Must try harder
# Do more research before making a dick of yourself |
Mr Dick Saint.
Pleaes pay more attention
We stopped playing in division 3 south in the mid 20's, but your club being more lethargic were still playing in the division 3 south in the late fifties.
We never finished in the bottom half of that league, but you did in fact 1th position. Therefore, when this is factored in with the division 3 north, you end up with the grand position of 71st - which is the very bottom league territory.
If you can't understand this, then you are a very dim tim. Its all here for you.
https://european-football-statistics.co.uk/attnclub/league/soto.htm
. [Post edited 12 Mar 17:39]
|  |
| |
| Leeds on 17:41 - Mar 12 with 1194 views | Newdawn2014 |
| Leeds on 16:12 - Mar 9 by solent_toffee |
Are you having a laugh? Says the scruffy meff wearing clown shoes. What an embarrassing individual he is. |
I think his brain is truly pickled , as The Kinks said , hes a dedicated follower of fashion. | | | |
| Leeds on 17:47 - Mar 12 with 1158 views | 130yrs_and_one_Cup |
| Leeds on 17:41 - Mar 12 by Newdawn2014 |
I think his brain is truly pickled , as The Kinks said , hes a dedicated follower of fashion. |
Your spelling and punctuation looks a bit pickled | |
| |
| Leeds on 17:51 - Mar 12 with 1154 views | 130yrs_and_one_Cup |
| Leeds on 11:18 - Mar 12 by PatfromPoole |
In one of your more perceptive posts over the years (though frankly if that isn't a contradiction in terms then I don't know what is....), you cited the presence of a local basketball team as being a key reason why the Pomps' attendances were so pitiful in years gone by.
Is basketball part of the infrastructure issues to which you allude?
PS Please do not forget the homework I set you last night. This is going to be part of a new daily routine to help get you up to speed in addressing your remedial deficiencies. |
Pubs per 100,000 people
Norwich 88.60 with 129 pubs
Brighton 72.95 with 204 pubs
Bristol 64.39 with 311 pubs
Portsmouth 63.72 with 134 pubs
Oxford 62.96 with 104 pubs
Plymouth 56.56 with 152 pubs
Cambridge 55.35 with 83 pubs
Guildford 51.62 with 77 pubs
Southampton 43.73 with 112 pubs
Why is Soton so crap on the pub count? Is your town just a bit unsocial, and hence why they are all so attracted to social media.
43 pubs per 100k population is extremely low. Almost half the amount that exist in Norwich. Its an embarassingly low number. [Post edited 12 Mar 19:31]
| |
| |
| Leeds on 18:16 - Mar 12 with 1171 views | PatfromPoole |
| Leeds on 17:32 - Mar 12 by 130yrs_and_one_Cup |
Mr Dick Saint.
Pleaes pay more attention
We stopped playing in division 3 south in the mid 20's, but your club being more lethargic were still playing in the division 3 south in the late fifties.
We never finished in the bottom half of that league, but you did in fact 1th position. Therefore, when this is factored in with the division 3 north, you end up with the grand position of 71st - which is the very bottom league territory.
If you can't understand this, then you are a very dim tim. Its all here for you.
https://european-football-statistics.co.uk/attnclub/league/soto.htm
. [Post edited 12 Mar 17:39]
|
1th position?
Tomorrow’s homework is as below:
I MUST IMPROVE MY KNOWLEDGE OF NUMBERS. IT IS AS BAD AS MY SPELLING.
In fact as you seem to be struggling to get up to speed, I am going to have to insist that you increase your homework to 150 lines.
A bit of tough love will reap the benefits in the long run. | |
| |
| Leeds on 18:47 - Mar 12 with 1130 views | 1teeminants |
| Leeds on 17:47 - Mar 12 by 130yrs_and_one_Cup |
Your spelling and punctuation looks a bit pickled |
Where yours is perfect of course
Mr Dick Saint.
Pleaes pay more attention
 |  |
| |
| Leeds on 23:54 - Mar 12 with 1044 views | LondonSaint76 |
| Leeds on 18:16 - Mar 12 by PatfromPoole |
1th position?
Tomorrow’s homework is as below:
I MUST IMPROVE MY KNOWLEDGE OF NUMBERS. IT IS AS BAD AS MY SPELLING.
In fact as you seem to be struggling to get up to speed, I am going to have to insist that you increase your homework to 150 lines.
A bit of tough love will reap the benefits in the long run. |
I think he only lines he is capable of doing involve white powder and a rolled up banknote. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Leeds on 15:59 - Mar 13 with 848 views | InTimeAddedOn |
| Leeds on 23:54 - Mar 12 by LondonSaint76 |
I think he only lines he is capable of doing involve white powder and a rolled up banknote. |
150 lines makes him a dealer. Get the arrest warrant issued! |  |
| |
| Leeds on 14:44 - Mar 14 with 746 views | TimSaint |
| Leeds on 17:32 - Mar 12 by 130yrs_and_one_Cup |
Mr Dick Saint.
Pleaes pay more attention
We stopped playing in division 3 south in the mid 20's, but your club being more lethargic were still playing in the division 3 south in the late fifties.
We never finished in the bottom half of that league, but you did in fact 1th position. Therefore, when this is factored in with the division 3 north, you end up with the grand position of 71st - which is the very bottom league territory.
If you can't understand this, then you are a very dim tim. Its all here for you.
https://european-football-statistics.co.uk/attnclub/league/soto.htm
. [Post edited 12 Mar 17:39]
|
The very link you kindly provided, actually shows us as competing in Division 3 South league for the seasons ending in 1954 through to 1958 inclusively.
Regardless of how we performed in that league and regardless of how you attempt to factor anything else in, we were still competing in Division 3 South - FACT.
Another dismal attempt to create yet another 'Portsmyth' to say that we played in the fourth tier - when clearly we never have, as backed up by your own referencing website. Sorry to disappoint, but we have never played in the 4th Tier.
Who cares if you didn't finish in the bottom half of that league or not ? It is hardly anything to be proud of, especially when your team actually spent FOUR seasons in the 4th Tier (very bottom league territory, as you call it) from 2013 through to 2017 inclusively.
Oh and if you tell someone to pay more attention, make sure you get your spelling and facts right - even after you've edited your post - otherwise you just look even more stupid.
'Pleaes pay more attention'
'but you did in fact 1th position'
Classic 130 :-) |  |
| |
| Leeds on 15:41 - Mar 14 with 709 views | BLEEDRED |
The statistics that 130 uses quite clearly state
Level 1 Saints 46 seasons, Portsmouth 33 seasons
Level 2 40 40
Level 3 11 18
Level 4 0 6
So are these fake?? | | | |
| Leeds on 16:05 - Mar 14 with 691 views | PatfromPoole |
| Leeds on 15:41 - Mar 14 by BLEEDRED |
The statistics that 130 uses quite clearly state
Level 1 Saints 46 seasons, Portsmouth 33 seasons
Level 2 40 40
Level 3 11 18
Level 4 0 6
So are these fake?? |
Who knows?
He seems to have moved on to pubs for his forensic level of data analysis.
Classic Monsieur Cent Trente tactic. When losing the argument, in true Trump-style, move it on to a completely different topic. | |
| |
| Leeds on 17:21 - Mar 14 with 642 views | kernow |
I was hoping they would but I expect they’ll be champions. | | | |
| Leeds on 18:51 - Mar 14 with 582 views | 130yrs_and_one_Cup |
| Leeds on 14:44 - Mar 14 by TimSaint |
The very link you kindly provided, actually shows us as competing in Division 3 South league for the seasons ending in 1954 through to 1958 inclusively.
Regardless of how we performed in that league and regardless of how you attempt to factor anything else in, we were still competing in Division 3 South - FACT.
Another dismal attempt to create yet another 'Portsmyth' to say that we played in the fourth tier - when clearly we never have, as backed up by your own referencing website. Sorry to disappoint, but we have never played in the 4th Tier.
Who cares if you didn't finish in the bottom half of that league or not ? It is hardly anything to be proud of, especially when your team actually spent FOUR seasons in the 4th Tier (very bottom league territory, as you call it) from 2013 through to 2017 inclusively.
Oh and if you tell someone to pay more attention, make sure you get your spelling and facts right - even after you've edited your post - otherwise you just look even more stupid.
'Pleaes pay more attention'
'but you did in fact 1th position'
Classic 130 :-) |
Only 21 teams had less points than you that year - so 71st position it was
You can try to spin it any way you want. We were in that league for just 3 seasons and never finished below 7th
FACT
SOUTH
14 Southampton 46 13 6 4 60 30 5 2 16 31 51 1.123 44
15 Aldershot 46 9 9 5 36 33 3 7 13 34 57 0.778 40
16 Exeter City 46 10 6 7 39 30 5 4 14 19 47 0.753 40
17 Reading 46 10 2 11 40 37 5 7 11 30 42 0.886 39
18 Queens Park Rangers 46 10 7 6 44 32 4 4 15 20 54 0.744 39
19 Newport County 46 12 2 9 32 26 3 7 13 26 53 0.734 39
20 Walsall 46 13 5 5 43 28 2 3 18 25 56 0.810 38
21 Watford 46 8 5 10 31 39 5 6 12 21 46 0.612 37
22 Millwall 46 13 4 6 56 31 2 2 19 27 69 0.830 36
23 Crystal Palace 46 7 3 13 27 32 5 7 11 27 51 0.651 34 Re-elected
24 Swindon Town 46 4 10 9 18 22 4 4 15 16 56 0.436 30
NORTH
13 Gateshead 46 15 4 4 56 32 2 7 14 21 52 0.917 45
14 Wrexham 46 11 5 7 37 28 5 5 13 29 45 0.904 42
15 Darlington 46 11 6 6 41 28 5 3 15 19 45 0.822 41
16 Tranmere Rovers 46 11 4 8 33 25 5 5 13 26 59 0.702 41
17 Chester 46 10 8 5 35 33 3 6 14 17 49 0.634 40
18 Mansfield Town 46 13 6 4 59 21 1 5 17 25 60 1.037 39
19 Halifax Town 46 10 6 7 40 27 4 5 14 26 49 0.868 39
20 Oldham Athletic 46 7 12 4 48 36 3 6 14 28 50 0.884 38
21 Carlisle United 46 11 3 9 45 36 4 5 14 26 59 0.747 38
22 Barrow 46 11 6 6 44 25 1 3 19 17 58 0.735 33
23 Bradford Park Avenue 46 13 4 6 47 38 0 3 20 14 84 0.500 33 Re-elected
24 Crewe Alexandra 46 9 4 10 32 35 0 6 17 18 70 0.476 28
Finishing below Gateshead is absolutely hilarious [Post edited 14 Mar 18:55]
| |
| |
| Leeds on 18:53 - Mar 14 with 576 views | 130yrs_and_one_Cup |
| Leeds on 16:05 - Mar 14 by PatfromPoole |
Who knows?
He seems to have moved on to pubs for his forensic level of data analysis.
Classic Monsieur Cent Trente tactic. When losing the argument, in true Trump-style, move it on to a completely different topic. |
Butty brought up social media, and he thinks its really important. Maybe not as much as pub culture eh? | |
| |
| Leeds on 19:04 - Mar 14 with 558 views | Butty101 |
| Leeds on 18:53 - Mar 14 by 130yrs_and_one_Cup |
Butty brought up social media, and he thinks its really important. Maybe not as much as pub culture eh? |
Twitter is a good measure of support.
Liverpool 4 million followers (big club)
Southampton 1.6million followers (medium club)
Portsmouth 160k followers (small club)
Facts my fishy friend |  |
| |
| Leeds on 19:12 - Mar 14 with 538 views | 1teeminants |
| Leeds on 19:04 - Mar 14 by Butty101 |
Twitter is a good measure of support.
Liverpool 4 million followers (big club)
Southampton 1.6million followers (medium club)
Portsmouth 160k followers (small club)
Facts my fishy friend |
According to 130 we have 1.6 million followers thinking we’re a big club . | |
| |
| Leeds on 19:45 - Mar 14 with 492 views | InTimeAddedOn |
| Leeds on 19:12 - Mar 14 by 1teeminants |
According to 130 we have 1.6 million followers thinking we’re a big club . |
With 130’s lack of ability to quote true facts, he’s skating on thin ice.
Or in his case, a skate on thin ice 🥶
Has he done his lines yet? (Sniff) 🙂 | |
| |
| Leeds on 20:46 - Mar 14 with 464 views | Butty101 |
| Leeds on 19:12 - Mar 14 by 1teeminants |
According to 130 we have 1.6 million followers thinking we’re a big club . |
Portsmouth are closer to Eastleigh who have 40k followers.  | |
| |
| Leeds on 22:56 - Mar 14 with 418 views | 1teeminants |
Ahh the noise . You’re all excited bless you. You’ve been bargain basement for so long that when you play clubs like Leeds it’s a real big deal for you whereas we’ve played all the big boys many times , the novelty sort of wears off a bit. Who can forget the Thierry Henry Farce where you chanted his name after he destroyed you , how embarrassing was that .
Don’t forget 130 theres not many clubs that can boast the amount of years we’ve been top flight. It’s really no big deal for us. [Post edited 14 Mar 23:01]
| |
| |
| Leeds on 01:03 - Mar 15 with 361 views | TimSaint |
| Leeds on 18:51 - Mar 14 by 130yrs_and_one_Cup |
Only 21 teams had less points than you that year - so 71st position it was
You can try to spin it any way you want. We were in that league for just 3 seasons and never finished below 7th
FACT
SOUTH
14 Southampton 46 13 6 4 60 30 5 2 16 31 51 1.123 44
15 Aldershot 46 9 9 5 36 33 3 7 13 34 57 0.778 40
16 Exeter City 46 10 6 7 39 30 5 4 14 19 47 0.753 40
17 Reading 46 10 2 11 40 37 5 7 11 30 42 0.886 39
18 Queens Park Rangers 46 10 7 6 44 32 4 4 15 20 54 0.744 39
19 Newport County 46 12 2 9 32 26 3 7 13 26 53 0.734 39
20 Walsall 46 13 5 5 43 28 2 3 18 25 56 0.810 38
21 Watford 46 8 5 10 31 39 5 6 12 21 46 0.612 37
22 Millwall 46 13 4 6 56 31 2 2 19 27 69 0.830 36
23 Crystal Palace 46 7 3 13 27 32 5 7 11 27 51 0.651 34 Re-elected
24 Swindon Town 46 4 10 9 18 22 4 4 15 16 56 0.436 30
NORTH
13 Gateshead 46 15 4 4 56 32 2 7 14 21 52 0.917 45
14 Wrexham 46 11 5 7 37 28 5 5 13 29 45 0.904 42
15 Darlington 46 11 6 6 41 28 5 3 15 19 45 0.822 41
16 Tranmere Rovers 46 11 4 8 33 25 5 5 13 26 59 0.702 41
17 Chester 46 10 8 5 35 33 3 6 14 17 49 0.634 40
18 Mansfield Town 46 13 6 4 59 21 1 5 17 25 60 1.037 39
19 Halifax Town 46 10 6 7 40 27 4 5 14 26 49 0.868 39
20 Oldham Athletic 46 7 12 4 48 36 3 6 14 28 50 0.884 38
21 Carlisle United 46 11 3 9 45 36 4 5 14 26 59 0.747 38
22 Barrow 46 11 6 6 44 25 1 3 19 17 58 0.735 33
23 Bradford Park Avenue 46 13 4 6 47 38 0 3 20 14 84 0.500 33 Re-elected
24 Crewe Alexandra 46 9 4 10 32 35 0 6 17 18 70 0.476 28
Finishing below Gateshead is absolutely hilarious [Post edited 14 Mar 18:55]
|
The only person trying to spin things is you. Does it really matter how long Pompey or Saints stayed in Division 3 South ? If it matters that much to you, perhaps look at which team has played the most in the 4th Tier ? That website you kindly provided in one of your previous threads, clearly shows Pompey as having 6 seasons in the 4th Tier and Saints having zero.
I admire your attempts to create another 'Portsmyth', but the facts are that during the season you are referring to, we neither played against teams in the Division 3 North League, nor played in the same league as them.
You therefore simply cannot compare, or cross reference any teams, results, scores, or points tallies, as the teams were not playing against each other and were playing in different leagues.
The Division 3 North and South Leagues were set up to prevent teams having to travel long distances for games - so that Southern Teams played each other and Northern Teams played each other. Hence why there were separate leagues and results. I suggest you Google it if you are still struggling.
Alas, and much to your obvious dismay, we never played Gateshead that season and were not in the same league as them, so any comparison you attempt to make is flawed from the start.
We could look at the 'very bottom league' as you call it, if you really want to though. Saints obviously haven't played that low down the leagues, but if we look at the 4th Tier (League 2) just TEN seasons ago, we can see that your team very impressively managed to finish above Accrington Stanley, York City, Cambridge United, Carlisle United, Mansfield Town, Hartlepool United, Cheltenham Town and Tranmere Rovers.
Oh and rather amusingly, failed to finish above AFC Wimbledon, Dagenham & Redbridge, Oxford United, Northampton Town, Morecambe, Exeter City, Newport County, Luton Town, Plymouth Argyle, Stevenage Borough, Southend United, Wycombe Wanderers, Bury, Shrewsbury Town and Burton Albion !! Now that's hilarious !! | |
| |
| Leeds on 01:06 - Mar 15 with 356 views | TimSaint |
You can only dream of playing Wolves, having not played them for 15 years !! | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
