By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Wait till he starts complaining about too many gingers in Scotland ..... there will be riots.
You gotta love the SNP. They get tied up in knots over the trans issue notwithstanding the fact that probably the most famous image of Scotland is of men wearing skirts…
Wait till he starts complaining about too many gingers in Scotland ..... there will be riots.
You gotta love the SNP. They get tied up in knots over the trans issue notwithstanding the fact that probably the most famous image of Scotland is of men wearing tartan skirts…
I agree, he should note that non whites are a minority in Scotland and work with that. As should many non white leaders in England. Minorities must have a say but sometimes the tail is wagging the dog. Same with LGBTXYZ leaders etc
I don't think he will be in the job for a great length of time and certainly not to the extent that Salmond or Sturgeon were (for a start he does not have a fishy surname). Being serious, it is clear that he is lacking unequivocal support in the party and his performance in a number of roles has not been that great.
It is often the way that when an organisation or country has a leader who has been in power for a sustained period of time, it is usually followed by a period of flux and unrest. The new leader may realise quite soon that he needs to do something that will win the hearts and minds of his colleagues in the SNP over (and to some extent the electorate in Scotland) and that may mean an attempt to fast track another referendum which requires our Parliament to support, which could be interesting (or not).
Well, if a white politician said that about lots of high positions held by black people in South Africa...would you say it was racist? Where the overwhelming majority are black.
Unlike the rest of the uk which is 83% white,Scotland is 89%
I don't think he will be in the job for a great length of time and certainly not to the extent that Salmond or Sturgeon were (for a start he does not have a fishy surname). Being serious, it is clear that he is lacking unequivocal support in the party and his performance in a number of roles has not been that great.
It is often the way that when an organisation or country has a leader who has been in power for a sustained period of time, it is usually followed by a period of flux and unrest. The new leader may realise quite soon that he needs to do something that will win the hearts and minds of his colleagues in the SNP over (and to some extent the electorate in Scotland) and that may mean an attempt to fast track another referendum which requires our Parliament to support, which could be interesting (or not).
If his performance in a number roles is not that great, then how did he end up in charge?
If his performance in a number roles is not that great, then how did he end up in charge?
Not sure Ron11. Maybe it was a case of better the devil you know! To be honest, I have no idea. My response was based on what commentators, pundits and media have said - and they are not always right - as we all know.